Swipe at PBS is pandering, not fiscal conservatism

During the first presidential debate, while stating that he liked Big Bird and even moderator Jim Lehrer, Mitt Romney continued to propose eliminating federal subsidies to PBS: a measly $444 million — about $1.42 for every American. It struck me as hypocritical to advocate meaningless cuts to public broadcasting in the name of deficit reduction while promising significant increases in defense spending when it isn’t needed or even asked for. That’s not fiscal conservatism, it’s political pandering.

Supporting educational and children’s programming that encourages critical thinking, problem solving, and working together is far more important and critical to the future success of America than adding to an already bloated defense budget. So, please hold off on purchasing another fighter jet, and just give me Elmo. I’m willing to pay a little more in taxes to cover Big Bird. In a never-ending TV transmission of Snooki, Honey Boo Boo, and Ricki Lake, I’m willing to fork over $1.42 for substance.

Jamie Merrill


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com