You can now read 5 articles in a month for free on Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.


He’d like to tell pollsters a thing or two, except for . . .

RE “Battle for Ohio heats up” (Page A1, Oct. 13): Wouldn’t it be interesting if no one gave an answer to pollsters? What would happen?

I’m not suggesting we stop cheering for any candidate, or attending a rally, or donating to a candidate, or even putting a campaign sign outside one’s house.

Continue reading below

All I am wondering is: What would happen if we didn’t tell pollsters who we were going to vote for? Would every state become a swing state?

All I know is that we vote by way of a secret ballot, and then all the ballots are counted, and the totals announced. Pretty ingenious to develop such a system for determining who gets to run things until the next elections, eh?

Where does it state in the Constitution that we are obliged to tell people how we, as individuals, cast a vote, or plan to?

Burton Klein


Loading comments...
Want each day's news headlines delivered fresh to your
inbox every morning? Just connect with us
in one of the following ways:
Please enter a valid email will never post anything without asking.
Privacy Policy
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of
Marketing image of