He’d like to tell pollsters a thing or two, except for . . .

RE “Battle for Ohio heats up” (Page A1, Oct. 13): Wouldn’t it be interesting if no one gave an answer to pollsters? What would happen?

I’m not suggesting we stop cheering for any candidate, or attending a rally, or donating to a candidate, or even putting a campaign sign outside one’s house.


All I am wondering is: What would happen if we didn’t tell pollsters who we were going to vote for? Would every state become a swing state?

All I know is that we vote by way of a secret ballot, and then all the ballots are counted, and the totals announced. Pretty ingenious to develop such a system for determining who gets to run things until the next elections, eh?

Get Arguable with Jeff Jacoby in your inbox:
Our conservative columnist offers a weekly take on everything from politics to pet peeves.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

Where does it state in the Constitution that we are obliged to tell people how we, as individuals, cast a vote, or plan to?

Burton Klein


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com