I fOUnd it telling to find the article “Analysis backs Brown’s bipartisan claims” on Page B13, after the obituaries, in the Oct. 16 Metro section.
Since it is of utmost importance to elect a US senator who is willing and able to work across the aisle, wouldn’t it have been fair and just reporting for the Globe to also be bipartisan and put this article about Senator Scott Brown on Page B1?
Comments
Since the analysis shows that he's not actually bipartisan, wouldn't a different headline have been in order? Something like: "Brown plays the numbers, but is not really bi-partisan when it counts" on page B1 would be fine with me.