letters | sunday forum

We ought to feel a taxing tug to guide our conservation

Regarding Brookline’s ban on plastic shopping bags, Al Lewis writes that the optimal solution is to tax retailers a penny or so per bag — little enough that retailers wouldn’t pass the tax to consumers — and spend that money on conservation measures (“Think of it as an exercise in economics,” Letters, Dec. 2). On the contrary, the solution is to impose a tax large enough that retailers would choose to pass it on, so that consumers would have a direct and clear incentive to avoid plastic bags.

In fact, the optimal solution is to tax both plastic and paper bags, with a higher tax on plastic because of its greater long-term environmental harm, to discourage, but not forbid, the use of throwaway bags.


Unfortunately, towns don’t have the power to impose a tax without the state Legislature’s permission. Since the Legislature doesn’t act, I say good for Brookline for taking what action it can.

Sue Felshin


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com