Policy needed to protect future generations from climate change

As a conservative, I found John E. Sununu’s Dec. 10 op-ed “Best energy policy? None” objectionable, given what an overwhelming consensus of leading climate scientists now know about climate change. I agree that government has no business picking winners and losers, but saddling future generations with potential runaway climate change would be immoral.

Environmentalists have a conservative desire: that our children and grandchildren live in a world with a climate similar to the one that Sununu and I were born into. This climate has persisted for the last 11,500 years, and supports life on earth as we know it.


We need a national energy policy that puts a price on carbon emissions to account for the costs imposed on society for using them — as measured in global warming, environmental damage, and human health costs — and facilitates a timely transition to carbon-free energy sources, such as alternative and nuclear energy. This can be done in a manner that harnesses market mechanisms such as fee and dividend or cap and trade, and that fosters innovation and limits the role of government.

David Flannery


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.