The facts outlined in Sarah Schweitzer’s article “Mass. lags on pay for women” (Page A1, Dec. 10) present a clear mandate to place greater value on the work that women do in their households, in the workplace, and in society.
Many attribute the wage gap to women choosing lower-paying careers. When more women entered the workforce during World War II, many of their occupations were devalued, perceived as “women’s work,” declining in skill, influence, and salary. The problem is not simply that women are choosing undervalued jobs; it is that society is undervaluing the jobs of women.
Comments
I worked in a responsible position and never felt 'undervalued' either at work (or at home). This article wants to perpetuate the old feeling of women being second-class citizens. Not true now - well maybe it depends on what part of the world you are in and the culture. 'Society is undervaluing..." well half of the 'society' is women and I don't think so.
Re: Deborah Re's letter concerning "Mass. lags on pay for women", she succinctly and correctly addresses the problem, and furnishes legitimate facts involving unfair treatment of women being "undervalued" in the workplace. I see a curious parallel, wherein domestic violence occurring in too many homes affects female children. When a parent mistreats a young daughter, she is made to feel unworthy, devalued. She will be less capable of seeking a superior job, paying a worthwhile salary. Society must take note of all that affects undervaluing the jobs of women. Thank you, Deborah, for your meaningful letter.