What’s point in tarnishing White legacy with unproved accusations?

I have no idea whether, as mayor of Boston, Kevin White took cash bribes or connived with Boston University to extort a payment from John Hancock (“The Kevin White legacy after release of FBI files,” Op-ed, Dec. 9). Joan Vennochi has no idea either, but she repeats those allegations anyway, although generations of prosecutors apparently felt that they could not be proved.

Why is it considered useful to print corrosive charges that you haven’t bothered to investigate or even evaluate?


Venocchi poses the question: “People are complicated, so why should their legacies by simple?” But the real question here is: Why should we complicate legacies further with allegations when we have no interest in their truth?

James Doyle


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com