letters | More sides to the gun debate

New armed guards at schools would foster the big government the NRA claims to fear

THE NATIONAL Rifle Association deliberated for an entire week after the Newtown tragedy, and their best response is a call for an armed guard in every public school (“The NRA’s extremist fantasy,” Editorial, Dec. 22).

If one extends this knee-jerk response to every shooting, then the NRA no doubt would be happy with armed police officers in every theater, shopping mall, etc. The long-term logical consequence of this argument is armed guards in every public space, just in case.


How ironic then that many supporters of the Second Amendment believe it is intended to allow ordinary citizens to defend themselves from an aggressive government, yet now the NRA is suggesting a more aggressive govenment, via an expanded, armed police force, to defend us from an armed citizenry.

Contradiction, anyone?

Christina Banta


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com