You can now read 10 articles in a month for free on BostonGlobe.com. Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

The Boston Globe

Letters

Letter | JUDGE UNDER SCRUTINY

Judge should not have had to drain own wallet to fight complaint

Regarding your above-the fold, front-page article on Judge Raymond G. Dougan’s acceptance of pro bono representation on the frivolous complaint filed against him by District Attorney Daniel Conley: Judge Dougan was forced to defend himself not for even a hint of corruption or intemperate behavior, but merely because the district attorney disagreed with his decisions. The groundless complaint, now dismissed, risked undermining the independence of the judicial branch, which is critical to the fair administration of justice.

In this context, attorney Michael Keating’s offer of pro bono representation and Dougan’s acceptance were proper, ethical, and consistent with the highest principles of a lawyer’s duty to the public.

Continue reading below

Do you suggest that Dougan should have been the only party to this action to personally defray the enormous cost of litigation? He would have had to spend his entire salary for two years. Would that be fair or just?

John Amabile

Brockton

The writer is a criminal defense lawyer and a former prosecutor.

You have reached the limit of 10 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week