Read as much as you want on BostonGlobe.com, anywhere and anytime, for just 99¢.
  

Letters | DEBATE STIRRED OVER GUN VIOLENCE

Gun-rights arguments are an insult to those who live under real tyranny

Donald Baker is correct when he reminds us that the Second Amendment is intended to give citizens a means to protect against the rise of a tyrannical government (“Don’t forget one key protection we need: against tyranny of government,” Letters, Jan. 20). Indeed, the First Amendment is intended to do the same.

Yet even though we have many restrictions on the First Amendment, opponents of gun control measures are allowed to openly preach insurrection against our government without ending up in jail, or worse. Meanwhile, as words like fascist, dictator, and tyranny are glibly thrown around, Egyptian citizens deposed a real dictator, without the protection of a First Amendment, and largely without guns.

Continue reading below

Our Constitution is strong and has withstood many tests; to suggest that we must choose between the lives of innocents and tyrannical government is insulting — to our government and to us. We do a disservice to our democracy and to the people who truly live under tyranny when we suggest that it is so fragile.

Ann Davis

Hudson

Loading comments...

You have reached the limit of 10 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week