You can now read 10 articles a month for free. Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

letters | GUN RIGHTS: BETWEEN THE EXTREMES

Protecting patients’ privacy while holding homicide rates down

The front-page article “A Mass. hedge in FBI gun checks: State law prevents sharing of records on mental health” (Jan. 28) adds to the stigmatization of people with mental illness that has been on the rise since the Newtown tragedy. The underlying premise is that mentally ill people are responsible for America’s exceptionally high rates of gun homicide as compared with other developed countries.

While Massachusetts has refused to violate the confidentiality and privacy rights of people with mental illness by adding their names to a federal database, it should be noted that the Commonwealth ranks 50th in gun homicide rates of all the states and the District of Columbia (only Hawaii ranks lower).

Continue reading below

These data should make it clear that there is no justification, in the name of reducing gun violence in Massachusetts, for violating the privacy rights of those receiving mental health services. Massachusetts should not follow the example of other states. Rather, other states may wish to adopt our approach and enact strict gun-control laws while providing services to their residents with mental illness in a confidential manner.

Leonard H. Glantz

Boston

The writer is professor of health law, bioethics, and human rights at Boston
University School of Public Health.

Loading comments...

You have reached the limit of 10 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week