The Boston Globe

Letters

letters

Must we always see straight domestic life as battle of the sexes?

In Beth Teitell’s article about big-screen TVs (“At home, huge screen can be a hard sell,” Page A1, Feb. 1), we read the same old line about the gender gap, but it is peddled under the notion of universal heterosexual marriage. Teitell’s article reinforces that outdated hobbyhorse that there’s just no getting along where (heterosexual) spouses are concerned. As a married straight person, I resent this. It’s beside the point that, when it came time to pick our new television, having gotten rid of our ancient Trinitron, I was the one — me, the woman — encouraging my husband to get a bigger TV. It’s also irrelevant that, despite his wariness of behemoth TVs, my husband is a huge sports fan.

It doesn’t have to be this way, my fellow Americans. We can create a loving marriage between two people who argue like cats and dogs, or cats and cats, or dogs and dogs, but respect each other as equals, not aliens from Mars or Venus.

Comments

you don't fit the agenda

The writer makes a good point  and begolfing provides the correct answer.

Afterall the Globe does have to answer to stock holders and fluff about 'boys' & 'girls' allows them to seem acceptable to the masses.

 

I think we all know very few of us fit the agenda, but it's still good to hear proof! 

Enjoy your new TV... and tune out the garbage