You can now read 10 articles in a month for free on Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

The Boston Globe


letters | sunday forum

Politicized role can detour prosecutors from mission of fairness

Giving grand jurors express powers of nullification is not the answer to the perceived problem of prosecutorial overreaching (“What’s missing from American justice,” Ideas, Feb. 3). First, to paraphrase Winston Churchill’s views on democracy, our system of criminal justice is the worst ever invented — except for all the others. While not perfect, our system generally works well. As far as prosecutorial overreaching goes, the biggest problem I see is that the job of top prosecutor has become too politicized. As Leon Neyfakh’s article notes, the job has routinely become a steppingstone to higher poltical office. Consequently, decisions on charges and sentencing are based at times on political expediency rather than fundamental fairness.

In my view this does not happen often, but nonetheless it happens too often. It should never happen at all. The media fall into this mindset. Prosecutors seeking higher office are lauded in print as tough; this can contribute to politically ambitious prosecutors’ fear of being perceived or described publicly in any other terms.

Loading comments...

You have reached the limit of 10 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week