letters | perils on two wheels

Presumption of fault should fall at motorists’ feet

Re “Cyclists say their rights go unrecognized” (Page A1, Feb. 15): Cyclists’ rights would be better protected and operators of motor vehicles would take more care if standards of proof were changed.

In Amsterdam, for example, when a motor vehicle collides with a cyclist, the vehicle operator is presumed to be at fault. This is analogous to the presumption of fault in rear-end accidents involving two vehicles.


A change such as this would go far to protect the safety of our cyclists.

Joel A. Feingold


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com