My heart goes out to the family of the cyclist who suffered a preventable death on a dangerous Wellesley road. I hope that a civil lawsuit against the government and private parties who caused or failed to prevent this foreseeable tragedy will bring the family some measure of relief. But advocates who look to the criminal law to provide cyclists with protection and respect should be careful what they ask for (“Cyclists say their rights are going unrecognized,” Feb. 15, and “As cycling gains popularity, an anti-cyclist bias remains,” Editorial, Feb. 24).
My observation of biking, driving, and law enforcement in Boston leads me to believe that a strict prosecutorial approach to traffic enforcement would turn more cyclists than motorists into criminals. If the goal is to prevent accidents, our tax dollars would be better spent on road engineering and public education than on prosecuting people who do not intend to cause harm.
Comments
You're a law professor?? I'm sorry I got drunk, sped and killed a family while driving my car.... I didn't intend to. Intention is not the issue here. It's the difference between murder and vehicular homicide. Watch the video and tell me that a reasonable driver whould do what this truck driver did - pulling into traffic right alongside the law abiding cyclist with his grill mere inches from him..... nevermind this particular driver's long history of failing to obey the rules of the road for the safety of all that use it.