Obama lets down the little guy with selective sequester relief

I am spitting mad over President Obama’s cave in to the moneyed class (“Air traffic controllers set to return to the job,” April 27) with his agreement to end air traffic controller furloughs imposed by the ill-conceived sequester.

The furloughs were a bad idea, and I think it’s terrific that the controllers are working again. However, I am deeply disappointed that the president didn’t show the courage to use the pain of slower air travel as leverage with Congress to propose legislation that would ease the hardship felt by the more disadvantaged in sequester-mandated cuts to Head Start, nutrition, housing, and unemployment programs.


As time goes along, and more cuts demanded by the sequester start showing up, will he have the courage to stand up to the inevitable clamor from Republicans to shift mandatory defense and other cuts to the backs of the hungry, under-educated, frail, and elderly?

Will our delightfully personable president have the courage to lead in the fight for the little guy?

Peter Dimond

West Newton

Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com