letters | controversy over umass

A shame to use hideous act to score political points against university

It’s a stretch for Joan Vennochi to use the Boston Marathon bombings to undermine a push for funding for the University of Massachusetts. In her May 9 op-ed column “Tsarnaev probe bad timing for UMass,” Vennochi suggests that, because one of the alleged terrorists attended UMass Dartmouth and seems to have been allowed to stay on despite having a large bill, all of the students and faculty in the UMass system may suffer.

The 50/50 investments passed by the House go just part of the way toward reversing a 31 percent cut in funding for the five-campus university over the past decade. These investments will generate necessary funds to make our university system that much better while holding down the tuition and fees for our students, who have been burdened with growing debt.


What a shame it would be were anyone to use one suspect of a hideous act to score a political attack against the 70,000 students who attend our Commonwealth’s public university.

Max Page


The writer, a professor of architecture and history, is director of historic preservation initiatives at UMass.

Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com