Letters

letters | reaching to bombing victims

There may be a better way to administer funds to victims

The lead editorial in the Globe May 31 argues that the deadline for filing claims to the One Fund for injuries in the Marathon bombing should remain June 15 because a fair division of the total funds requires knowing how many people have claims on those funds (“Let One Fund deadline stand, but help victims apply”).

That seems wrong. An initial pool of the total funds could meet medical and living expenses for those injured and their families, at least for those who meet certain criteria of eligibility for those funds. Then the balance could be fairly allocated to all claimants from the remaining funds. In this way, immediate needs could be met, and fairness for the magnitude of the claims could be preserved.

Norman Daniels

Brewster

The writer is a professor of ethics and population health at the Harvard School of Public Health.

Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com