Read as much as you want on BostonGlobe.com, anywhere and anytime, for just 99¢.

letters | high court rules on voting and marriage

Court now riven by partisan politics

Chief Justice John G. Roberts wrote the decision overturning a part of the Voting Rights Act.

Associated Press/File 2010

Chief Justice John G. Roberts wrote the decision overturning a part of the Voting Rights Act.

RE “COURT voids a vital part of ’65 Voting Act” (Page A1, June 26)

The decisions rendered by the Supreme Court this week convince me that the court is as dysfunctional as the legislative branch. Neither the majority decision concerning the Voting Rights Act nor the Defense of Marriage Act were based on matters of law: they were political decisions by highly partisan political appointees, dressed in legal language. This is most evident in the majority's dismissal of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's eloquent and detailed dissent in the voting decision.

Continue reading below

Yes, “we” (whether progressives or conservatives) win some, lose some — but the decisions are not judicial; they are entirely political. The present conservative majority is intent on ensuring that our democracy is well on its way to transition to an oligarchy, awash in corporate money and enforced by gerrymandered districts assuring a Republican House. There is no such thing any longer as settled law; anything can and apparently will be rewritten by a bare minimum of 5-4 as its members are replaced by one president or another.

James E. Haber

Wayland

Loading comments...
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com