Without quorum, agency boards’ votes are meaningless

RE “Failure to get quorum didn’t stop state panels” (Page A1, July 28): “Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised” clearly states that “in the absence of a quorum, any business transacted is null and void.”

I have served on various civic, service, and town organization boards as member or chairman, and the first thing BEFORE even starting the meeting is to be sure a quorum of members is present. This is just basic to running an official meeting.


Your reporter writes that James Lampke, executive director of the Massachusetts Municipal Lawyers Association, says that “occasional errors are inevitable in government.” Perhaps Lampke thinks this is OK, but I do not.

This is a matter of just following the rules, and these boards under the state Department of Public Health did not. What will THIS DPH lapse cost us taxpayers? What will the next failure be for the agency?

Harry Haldt


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com