Consumers in Massachusetts may soon notice an unfamiliar warning sticker on their marijuana vapes: “This product was previously quarantined. Passed retesting for heavy metals and Vitamin E Acetate.”
But that’s not the whole story.
What the sticker won’t say is that the vape is one of more than 619,000 that have been sitting in vaults at cannabis facilities across the state since September, when Governor Charlie Baker temporarily banned the devices in an effort to combat an outbreak of vaping-related lung illnesses.
Nor will it disclose that a small but significant proportion of those products recently tested positive for high levels of toxic lead, likely leached from the vape cartridges — which are largely unregulated and typically manufactured in China — into the cannabis concentrate they contain during the months spent gathering dust.
And the label certainly doesn’t tell consumers that state marijuana officials more or less concede lead-spiked products could potentially make it to dispensary shelves, under a new Cannabis Control Commission order that gives pot companies the go-ahead to sell the aging vapes as long as just half of 1 percent of each “batch” passes testing for heavy metals.
“There continues to be a risk that vaporizer product hardware may contaminate marijuana concentrate over time with heavy metals,” the commission’s executive director, Shawn Collins, acknowledged in the order, issued after months of pressure from marijuana operators eager to make back their investments and free up storage space.
The new system “mitigates, but does not eliminate, the public health risk posed by vaporizer products previously subject to quarantine.”
Now, experts are hitting the commission for its decision to release the old vapes, noting that the agency’s own investigation failed to conclusively determine the source of the lead or explain why repeated tests of the same batches yielded highly variable results.
“It concerns me that we haven’t addressed the inconsistencies — that part of the data set is hard to ignore,” said Michael Kahn, president of Framingham-based MCR Labs, which was hired by the commission to test vapes for its investigation. “If this was purely a public health and toxicology decision, it probably would have come out differently.”
Kahn also questioned the commission’s testing system, saying a half-percent sample is insufficient and that officials should instead adopt a protocol recommended by the World Health Organization that better scales to different batch sizes.
Under the current system, Kahn said, some contaminated vapes “will make it through. I don’t see how they wouldn’t.”
Commission officials counter that licensed cannabis companies can destroy the previously quarantined vapes voluntarily, or break them open and reprocess the oil inside to remove any heavy metals before using it to make new vapes or other cannabis-infused products — a route many operators appear to favor.
Batches of vapes that tested positive for lead during the agency’s investigation cannot be retested and sold, they added, and the agency has published its test results online.
The commission also tightened its regulations when sales of newly manufactured vapes resumed in December, mandating greater disclosures about ingredients and tests for the Vitamin E acetate additive thought to be largely responsible for last year’s lung illnesses.
The new order “places patient and adult-use consumer safety at the forefront,” a commission spokeswoman said in a statement. “Additional requirements around labeling, disclosures, and manufacturer/supplier information will arm patients and consumers with the critical information they need to decide whether or not they would like to purchase a previously quarantined product.”
However, a dozen cannabis consumers and medical marijuana patients who spoke to the Globe uniformly and emphatically rejected the idea of buying any affected vapes, with several saying the new label doesn’t provide nearly enough warning about the possibility of lead contamination. Others expressed disbelief that the quarantined devices weren’t simply destroyed, though none tested positive for Vitamin E acetate.
“My reaction would be to walk out of the store,” said Chandra Batra, a Cambridge resident who uses the drug to treat fibromyalgia. “This is medicine that will end up in the hands of vulnerable patients. I don’t want to know what happens to a product that’s been sitting on the shelf for a year. [Marijuana companies] should have just eaten the cost” and disposed of the vapes.
Even some marijuana retailers are wary of selling the vapes with year-old cartridges. Meg Sanders, the chief executive of Canna Provisions, said it’s asking suppliers about the feasibility of reprocessing the concentrate in its $150,000 inventory of previously quarantined vapes.
”It would be difficult to put full confidence behind the products I have in my hand,” said Sanders, whose company operates dispensaries in Easthampton, Holyoke, and Lee. “You’re always walking a line with consumer trust, especially in this relatively new industry, and the last thing we want is headline risk. If there’s even an intimation that somebody got sick because of one of these products, it really doesn’t help anyone.”
Doctors who treat medical marijuana patients are also worried, noting that lead can be acutely toxic even in small quantities.
“If there’s any non-insignificant chance of a vape with high levels of lead getting through, that’s a really big deal,” said Dr. Peter Grinspoon, a Harvard Medical School instructor who testified last year in court against Baker’s vape ban. “We’re not talking about saturated fat here. I would take a really cautious and conservative stance.”
Another concern shared by both medical professionals and some in the industry: THC and other psychoactive compounds in cannabis concentrate can degrade over time, potentially altering the effects of the year-old vapes.
“This seems like a bad deal for consumers all around,” Grinspoon said. “The doctor in me just says, throw them all away. Safety is more important than profit.”
On the other hand, Kahn said, vape cartridges found on the illicit market are far more likely to be dangerous. And, he argued, the point of regulating alcohol, marijuana, and other such substances is not to eliminate the risks of consumption but reduce them.
Still, that’s unlikely to placate consumers and patients in the know, such as Batra.
“I have no confidence in this system at all,” she said. “It’s scary.”