Q. I am a 47-year-old woman. My husband, “Bart,” and I have been together for eight years. Bart (age 50) is a firefighter in a large city.
Bart has several tattoos on this left arm (a “sleeve”). His tattoos are tasteful and well thought out. Whenever he considers a new tattoo, he takes his ideas and rough sketch to his tattoo artists. He then carefully reconsiders the design and placement on this arm. He takes a lot of time before finally getting inked.
Two days ago, Bart told me that he was going to get some touch-ups done on his existing tattoos. This is not unusual. When he arrived back home, he not only had the touch-ups done, but a brand-new tattoo.
This new tattoo is approximately 8 inches long — starting at his neck and going right down the middle of his chest. It is not the tattoo that was shocking to me, but the placement of it. The tattoos on his arm never bothered me. But I cried for hours the first night he had his new one.
Bart asked if we could talk about it, but I knew I would react in a way that was not going to be positive for the relationship, so I just said, “I can’t talk about it yet.”
I am now on day three, and my feelings about this have not changed. I am still visibly upset.
I know this is permanent. I am just going to have to get over it, but I don’t know how to explain my feelings to my husband, because I am struggling to understand them.
I know that if he’d had this tattoo when I met him, I would have never gone on the first date — I just find it so unattractive. Right now, I do not want him touching me and we are barely speaking to each other.
My husband is a very vain man. I know I have wounded his pride/ego with my reaction to this.
What should I do?
A. You say you don’t want to wound your husband’s ego (you are not in charge of protecting and placating his ego, by the way), but, if that is your goal, then days of silence punctuated by crying will be worse for him, his ego, and your relationship, than the truth.
This is his body. He has the right to adorn it. But the thing about a tattoo on the neck and down the breastbone is that others will look at it more often than he does. And you, arguably, will see it more often than anyone.
So, tell him: “I’m not really sure why this has upset me so much, but it is the placement of it that is triggering my emotions.”
I could guess that the ink’s presence so near to his pulsing jugular, heart, and lungs might remind you that this physically brave man (whose job is to save people, after all), is actually extremely vulnerable.
You are vulnerable too, and it’s time to be honest about that.
Q. In a supermarket, If the checkout lane has two positions across an aisle from each other, and only one position is manned, the line forms for that position.
If the second position subsequently opens up, should all customers remain in the one original line, or is it OK if some customers filter across and form a second line for the newly opened position?
A. Forgive my presumption, but I’m assuming that you might be one of my extra-polite Canadian readers, because, well, it’s hard to imagine any American standing in a full queue when there was an adjacent available cashier.
To answer your question (and this exact scenario happened to me yesterday), many times a cashier opening up will say, “I’ll take the next customer over here...” and the next person in the original line will shift over and start a new queue.
Sometimes the last person in the original line will race forward to take the first slot in the new queue, but this is bad form.
Q. “Grieving” wrote to you, saying their daughter had become estranged, due to a mix-up of the timing of a funeral, which the daughter had missed.
Has it come to this? Family members will initiate a total estrangement over a relatively minor issue?
A. My theory is that, like many other dynamics relating to families, estrangement is actually quite complicated.
Amy Dickinson can be reached at email@example.com.