fb-pixel Skip to main content

This food magazine analyzed America’s best and worst cities for BBQ. People disagreed

“This must be a joke.”

This map shows the top cities for BBQ in America, according to a Chef's Pencil analysis of TripAdvisor data.Chef's Pencil

May is National Barbecue Month, and to mark the occasion, a food magazine took a stab at ranking the best and worst cities in the US for “enjoying a fantastic BBQ.” Perhaps predictably, chaos ensued.

Chef’s Pencil, based in Sydney, Australia, analyzed customer ratings from Needham-based TripAdvisor of all barbecue joints in America’s largest cities. It also ranked cities by the number of barbecue places per capita, as well as those with the highest number of top-rated barbecue eateries (a rating a 4.5 or higher).

But the results raised some eyebrows among readers, as the top of the list featured several cities not exactly known for their barbecue.


New Orleans and Oklahoma City were ranked as the top two cities, followed by Charlotte, Wichita, and Virginia Beach tied for third. Ranked next were Columbus, Seattle, St. Louis, Miami, and Newark.

Meanwhile, storied bastions of barbecue like Kansas City and Memphis were left completely off the top 10 list. And Texas -- home of the brisket -- was not only shut out of the top 10 list, but also saw four prominent cities placed in the bottom 10: Houston, San Antonio, Fort Worth, and Plano.

Chef’s Table seemed to acknowledge the apparent discrepancy in the rankings for Houston and San Antonio, noting: “Both cities are well known for their amazing food culture, which may have something to do with this bad overall rating,” the magazine said.

But many weren’t having it.

“This must be a joke,” said Texas politician Julián Castro, who tweeted a photo of a map from the Chef’s Table article highlighting the “top cities” to which there is no Texas representation.

California Representative Ted Lieu also took issue with the rankings.

“I’m from California where we put Kimchi on our BBQ, and even I know this map is wrong. Newark? Really?” Lieu tweeted.


Many others took to the platform to lobby for their city, or even denounce their own city’s high ranking.

“No Kansas City?” one user inquired.

“Seattle should not be on this list. Signed, a Seattlite,” another user tweeted.

“Nobody goes to St. Louis for BBQ unless they plan on heading 4 hours west to Kansas City,” one user said.

“I am insulted. There are only three types of BBQ that should ever be construed as real Q. Texas, KC, and North Carolina. All others are pretenders to the throne,” another user tweeted.

The outcry reached the point where TripAdvisor came out to disavow the rankings: “Very important,” the company tweeted with siren emojis. “We did not make those wild BBQ maps.”

Bringing up the rear were Anchorage, Plano, and Boston.

That’s right, Boston.

With an average customer rating of 3.82, Chef’s Pencil said you are more likely to step into an average barbecue restaurant than a great one in Boston, although “the odds are on your side” moreso than in Anchorage or Plano.

Curiously, there was no outcry over Boston’s low ranking. Maybe we’re just more mellow than the rest of the country about these things.

These cities are the worst for BBQ, according to a Chef's Pencil analysis of TripAdvisor data.Chef's Pencil

Brittany Bowker can be reached at brittany.bowker@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @brittbowker and on Instagram @brittbowker.