The passionate and proudly obscure world of organ building is torn over a revolutionary digital organ created by a Needham company
Jared Wickerham for the Boston Globe
A revolution rattling the world of organ music
The passionate and proudly obscure world of organ building is torn over a revolutionary digital organ created by a Needham company
WHEELING, W.V. — Doug Marshall wasn’t thrilled with what he heard.
Seated at a makeshift desk at St. Matthew’s Episcopal Church, the organ maker ascended the keys of a plastic keyboard he’d propped on a pew to his side. A laptop glowed before him. But the real object of his attention stood by the altar: Opus 10, his newly minted digital organ with four keyboards, a gleaming shell of burnished wood, and the full sonic force, filigree, and thunder of 9,000 pipes — all without a pipe to be found.
Along with his business partner, David Ogletree, Marshall had been at work on the instrument for more than a year, their crew soldering components, wiring circuitry, and fine-tuning software. All told, the organ boasted more than 6 miles of wire, 72 speakers, and 18,000 watts of power. Now, as Marshall sat in St. Matthew’s 19th-century nave, their work was nearing completion: Opus 10 (the 10th instrument they’ve built together) would finally — finally! — receive its voice.
“The instrument I’m most interested in building is the one I hear in my head,” said Marshall, a quiet man given to sturdy shoes and holstering his smartphone on a belt. “To be able to go in any direction — as far as the mind can dream.”
More than dreamers, Ogletree and Marshall are revolutionaries in the erudite, passionate, and proudly obscure world of organ building. From their base in Needham, Mass., they have set out to build the finest, cost-is-no-object digital organs in the world — instruments to rival in grandeur the world’s leading pipe organs. And by many accounts have succeeded, brilliantly. But their aspirations have also engendered hostility and suspicion among traditionalists, who see in their work a high-tech incursion on their aesthetic preserve.
The pair’s pursuit of perfection has taken them to churches and concert halls across the country, where they’ve taped thousands of samples of pipe organ sounds for their software to summon and blend. It also had Marshall locked this day in a tense but rewarding exercise, tuning their new instrument to the church where it will live: As with all great organs, the entire building would be Opus 10’s sounding board.
After sliding into a pair of organ slippers — special shoes that facilitate toe-heel runs along the instrument’s pedals — Marshall, 67, had spent the morning putting Opus 10 through its paces. The organ had performed precisely as he hoped it could,
But Marshall was in for a rude awakening.
“That’s a little on the tubby side,” he said, frowning as the organ stumbled on an F-sharp. “That’s a note I’m not too happy with.”
Marshall had been camped out like this for nearly a week, “voicing” Opus 10. But whereas a traditional builder would hone an instrument’s pipes to match the room, Marshall trafficked in RAM, sound samples, and processors.
“We’re probably one of the greatest threats to the industry of pipe organ building,” said Ogletree. “We would like to be thought of some day as the next great American organ builders.”
It’s an aspiration that doesn’t sit well with many pipe-organ aficionados, who argue that the enveloping, magisterial sound of the pipe organ can barely be approximated by even the finest digital simulacrum.
“I don’t have any problem with it, but don’t call it an organ,” said Jonathan Ambrosino, a Boston-area pipe organ consultant. “It’s an essay from Nabokov, and a paragraph from Joan Didion, and the best bits of Jane Austen strung together at whim. It doesn’t seem like there’s an artist sitting down and sculpting a brand new instrument. A collection of things, yes, but not an instrument.”
Nevertheless, the Needham-based operation’s technological savvy has paid off. Marshall & Ogletree instruments reside in several of the country’s great churches, including New York City’s Trinity Wall Street, where the company replaced the pipe organ destroyed during the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. It was their first creation — their Opus 1.
“No one on the planet is running around building organs like these,” said J. Owen Burdick, Trinity’s former music director, who commissioned the organ. “They passed every test.”
ith its Rube Goldberg network of pipes, wind, keys, and wiring, the pipe organ is perhaps the most mysterious – and majestic – of instruments. Mozart once crowned it “the king of instruments,” a nod not only to the organ’s outsized symphonic sound, but also to its titanic proportions and close, historic association with Christian worship and churches.
“The architecture and instrument are one together,” said Richard Clark, music director for Saint Cecilia Parish in Boston.
The complex workings of great organs also add to their otherworldly aura. For one thing, the intensity of an organ’s sound is not tied to a performer’s physical exertion. When an organist presses a key, air from a pressurized chest is released to an assigned set of pipes. Known as a “rank,” these tonally consistent sets can evoke anything from a tuba or chimes to the human voice. Rank can be laid upon rank, creating vast sound palaces that sail through the air.
“That’s why you don’t hear any distortion in a pipe organ,” said Peter Krasinski, dean of the Boston chapter of the American Guild of Organists. “They’re all talking to each other just like in an orchestra.”
The instrument’s sheer size adds to its allure. Unlike a Stradivarius or Steinway, organs rarely travel. For the small but devoted group of aficionados — many of whom make pilgrimages to hear, play, and climb around the inner workings of these beloved monarchs — the idea that the pipe organ could be reduced to an iPod-friendly set of sound files, recordings drawn from instruments of traditional lineage, isn’t mere hubris: it’s anathema.
“The poverty of the imagination of the electronic organ is that it’s still trying to imitate the pipe organ,” said Ambrosino. “If it really had some creative authority, it would try to be its own thing.”
or the better part of two decades, Marshall and Ogletree have armed themselves with sensitive microphones and climbed into the cramped chambers that house organ pipes. They’ve captured individual pipe sounds from nearly 100 organs, later massaging each file into a usable sample.
Scrolling through his computer, Marshall essentially had the entire history of the American pipe organ at his fingertips. With just a few clicks, he could enable Opus 10 to mimic instruments as varied as Wurlitzer, German Baroque, or French Romantic organs.
“Because you’re playing samples, because you’re playing recordings, you could literally play bathtubs on this thing,” said Burdick. “Anything that you can record, you can play.”
Now — faced with that one balky tone — Marshall was looking for something specific: an F-sharp to match St. Matthew’s state trumpet, a set of pipes (or “stop”) whose sound they had captured from the church’s previous organ.
“It’s a lovely stop,” he said, tapping keys to replace the flabby note. “You can put a lot of organ around that, and still hear it.”
Though he spends most of his time these days building instruments, Marshall was first an accomplished organist. As a young man he studied with the legendary Virgil Fox, winning the 1972 American Guild of Organists National Playing Competition. Ogletree, meanwhile, studied organ at the University of Massachusetts before earning a graduate degree from the Curtis Institute of Music in Philadelphia.
“Both are seriously heavyweight organ players,” said Cameron Carpenter, a Grammy-nominated organist who commissioned the pair to build the International Touring Organ, a portable five-keyboard instrument.
Still, neither Marshall nor Ogletree had any experience crafting organs when they began toying with the idea in the mid-1990s. By then, the idea of sampling individual pipes to create sounds was nothing new. But computing power was relatively modest, and many electronic organ makers would record only brief bursts of sound, which they would then loop into a continuous sample.
Convinced they could do better, the pair began making voluptuous recordings that often lasted a minute or more. Marshall, meanwhile, tinkered into the night with hardware prototypes.
“We knew right away when we heard it that we were on to something,” said Ogletree, 52. But with their rudimentary rig barely up and running, their passion project took on a new sense of urgency when Burdick came looking to replace the Trinity pipe organ that had been destroyed by the dust clouds at ground zero.
Many of the world’s top-tier organ builders had already consulted with Burdick. Not only was Trinity one of the wealthiest churches in the country, but its choice of organ was given added weight by the church’s association with 9/11. The replacement had to be something very special.
“I didn’t need to play more than about five seconds to know that this was something completely different,” said Burdick. “It was absolute perfection. They had done it.”
Nevertheless, Burdick’s decision to hire Marshall & Ogletree — amateur builders who had never completed an instrument — was a controversial one, decried by many in the pipe organ community.
“I received death threats,” said Burdick, who now serves as the organist and choirmaster at Church of the Ascension and Saint Agnes in Washington, D.C.. “ ‘What are you thinking?’ ” he recalled people saying. “ ‘This is an abomination!’ ”
Still, the trio stuck with their plan. They would use only the best materials: solid wood-core keyboards from England, handmade consoles to rival those of the grandest pipe organs, bidirectional speakers to better fill the air.
“The goal of the electronic organ has never been the pursuit of perfection,” said Ogletree. “It’s always been . . . lots of value, big sound, lots of features, and low cost. Doug and I have a different goal: How good could it be?”
But their real innovations came under the hood, closely held technological secrets they refuse to patent or discuss.
Competitors “would have to tear one apart to find out what we’re doing,” said Ogletree, who unveiled Opus 1 at a dedication ceremony on Sept. 11, 2003. “They want to try to duplicate it? Good luck.”
n the years since, the pair have continued to refine their work. They’re obsessive in their attention to detail, recording not only pipes, but also the rumble of the blower and the hiss of moving valves. They delight in the clicking of keys andthe gasping of pipes.
“No school is off-limits,” said Marshall. “I want to bring the most fascinating elements of each one, and find a way to make them into a creative whole.”
Still, Ogletree concedes that there are certain perhaps irreducible differences in the aural and even physical sensation of a pipe organ’s sound, versus that of a digital instrument.
“The way the air pressure presses on your body? That’s a very different experience,” he said. “When we can cross that bridge, we’ll be there.”
But adherents like Burdick believe that in many ways, Marshall & Ogletree LLC has already arrived, its instruments filling a broad niche for many midsized churches: a world-class instrument that costs between $300,000 and $1.5 million.
That was undoubtedly one of the considerations in West Virginia, where Robert Troeger, music director at St. Matthew’s, said church officials balked at the price of pipe organs before opting for Opus 10, which cost roughly $750,000.
The quality of the instrument and the limitations of space and finances had to align, and Troeger was sure they would: He had already heard Opus 1 at Trinity.
“I was astounded,” he said. “There was no way we could not do this.”
Ingrid Christiansen, 89, went into cardiac arrest in the middle of a concert by the chamber music ensemble Mistral. What happened next was dramatic.Continue reading »
Ty Burr examines how the streaming service transformed not only the way he listens to popular music, but the kinds of music and artists he listens to.Continue reading »
The once-heralded stop-motion film has made the news for all the wrong reasons.Continue reading »
The composition of the painting is as sturdy and symmetrical as a good piece of carpentry, but the detail tickles you under the chin.Continue reading »
We really didn’t need “Fuller House,” which pales in comparison to modern TV comedies.Continue reading »
Call it a coping mechanism as I contemplate the end of “Mad Men”: arranging the characters in order of how much I’ll miss them.Continue reading »
In “Bush,” biographer Jean Edward Smith’s tone is so critical that it often clouds an otherwise carefully researched portrait.Continue reading »
Ryuichi Sakamoto, Quincy Jones, and David Bowie films are among many outstanding music documentaries from 2018.Continue reading »
Saoirse Ronan plays the title role; Margot Robbie plays her cousin and rival, Elizabeth I.Continue reading »