FDIC considers new UK rules

WASHINGTON — US banks would have to restructure how they handle deposits in their British branches under a rule proposed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. in answer to a British regulatory push for more depositor protections.

US bank branches in Britain may have to make deposits payable in both jurisdictions to avoid running afoul of British expectations that depositors there be put on even ground with those in the United States if the bank fails. The rule proposed Tuesday by the unanimous FDIC board clarifies how that would work while insisting its deposit-insurance fund stay walled off to non-US deposits.

Britain’s Financial Services Authority has been trying to ensure depositors to non-UK bank branches are treated similarly to those in the institutions’ home countries during bank liquidations. The FDIC proposal is meant to align with those changes while guaranteeing the FSA’s eventual requirements don’t result in the FDIC insuring deposits there.


‘‘Today’s proposed regulation would allow US banks with UK branches to exercise existing authority that would bring them into compliance with the FSA’s proposal by making deposits payable in the United States, without triggering US deposit insurance coverage,’’ said FDIC chairman Martin Gruenberg.

Get Talking Points in your inbox:
An afternoon recap of the day’s most important business news, delivered weekdays.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

The FDIC’s proposal says depositors at overseas branches of US banks, typically large corporations rather than retail customers, could be granted so-called depositor preference if the deposits were also payable in the United States. In case of a bank failure, that would put the uninsured depositors in line ahead of general creditors.

‘‘If the FDIC addresses only whether a deposit is insured or not, it doesn’t seem to be addressing the underlying issue,’’ said Michael Krimminger, a former FDIC general counsel who left the agency last year to work for Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton in Washington.

He said his US banking clients would have preferred that the regulator eliminate discrepancies with UK protections by simply granting depositor preference to the deposits in their overseas branches without requiring that they also be payable in the US.

Bloomberg News