High-quality alternatives to Google Reader
Pro: Highlighter feature identifies important stories using keywords; easy sharing with Facebook Twitter, and Google Plus; better looking than Google Reader
Con: Adding new sites can be difficult; occasional buggy performance; can’t directly install Google Reader sites; available only through Web browsers.
Pro: Visually attractive layout; sites can be sorted into folders; handy feature instantly identifies “dead” sites that are rarely updated; social features let you share favorite sites with Facebook friends.
Con: Folder feature is relatively hard to use; can’t directly install Google Reader sites; available only through Web browsers.
Pro: Gorgeous magazine-style layout; can import favorite sites directly from Google Reader; runs on iOS and Android phones and tablets
Con: Not available for desktop computers; screen layout makes it hard to quickly view multiple news items on smartphones
Pro: Available for PCs, iOS and Android phones and tablets; attractive design; allows easy sorting of sites into topic folders; excellent tools for finding and adding new sites.
Con: Lacks a browser plug-in for Microsoft’s Internet Explorer.Hiawatha Bray can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.