Rollout of new medical billing system has some on edge
Know someone who drowned from jumping off burning water skis? Well, there's a new medical billing code for that.
Been injured in a spacecraft? There's a new code for that, too.
Roughed up by a killer whale? It's on the list.
Starting next year, a transformation is coming to the arcane world of medical billing. Overnight, virtually the entire health care system — Medicare, Medicaid, private insurers, hospitals, doctors, and various middlemen — will switch to a new set of computerized codes used for reporting what ailments patients have and how much they and their insurers should pay for a specific treatment.
The changes are unrelated to the Obama administration's new health care law. But given the lurching start of the federal health insurance website, HealthCare.gov, some doctors and health care information technology specialists fear major disruptions in health care delivery if the new coding system — also heavily computer-reliant — is not put in place properly. They are pushing for a delay of the scheduled start date of Oct. 1 — or at least more testing beforehand.
"If you don't code properly, you don't get paid," said Dr. W. Jeff Terry, a urologist in Mobile, Ala., who is one of those who thinks staffs and computer systems, particularly in small medical practices, will not be ready in time. "It's going to put a lot of doctors out of business."
The new set of codes, known as ICD-10, allows for much greater detail than the existing set, ICD-9, in describing illnesses, injuries, and treatment procedures. That could allow for improved tracking of public health threats and trends and better analysis of the effectiveness of various treatments.
Officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services declined to be interviewed about the new codes. But a spokeswoman said the agency is "committed to implementing ICD-10 on Oct. 1, 2014, and that will not change."
In a letter in November, Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of health and human services, told Senator Jeff Sessions, Republican of Alabama, that Medicare and Medicaid officials were working diligently to help doctors get ready.
"ICD-10 is foundational for building a modernized health care system that will facilitate broader access to high quality care," she wrote.
Still, the troubles with HealthCare.gov have given new ammunition to those urging a go-slow approach on ICD-10 and have made it harder for the government to stand behind assurances that the transition will go smoothly.
"Failure to appropriately test ICD-10 could result in operational problems similar to what the Department experienced with the rollout of HealthCare.gov," the Medical Group Management Organization, which represents the business managers of medical practices, said in a letter this month to Sebelius.
The Medicare and Medicaid office now appears to be open to greater testing of the system. Also this month, the Obama administration relaxed some deadlines for parts of the health care law, and some deadlines under a separate law for enacting electronic medical records.
"I think that people at CMS understand the stakes with respect to ICD-10 in a heightened way as a result of HealthCare.gov," said Linda E. Fishman, senior vice president for policy at the American Hospital Association.
ICD-10 has already been postponed by a year. It was originally scheduled to go into effect this past Oct. 1, which would have coincided with the rollout of the insurance website.