Next Score View the next score

    Court affirms whistleblower protections in Fidelity case

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that whistleblower protections in a federal law passed in response to the Enron financial scandal apply to employees of publicly traded companies and contractors hired by the companies.

    The justices voted 6 to 3 in favor of two former employees of companies that administer the Fidelity family of mutual funds. The workers claimed they faced retaliation after they reported allegations of fraud affecting Fidelity funds.

    The case involved the reach of a provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, passed in 2002 in response to the Enron scandal, which protects whistleblower activity. The measure was intended to protect people who expose the kind of corporate misdeeds that arose at Enron.


    Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that the law ‘‘shelters employees of private contractors that serve public companies, just as it shelters the public companies’ own employees.’’

    Get Talking Points in your inbox:
    An afternoon recap of the day’s most important business news, delivered weekdays.
    Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

    Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Samuel Alito, and Anthony Kennedy dissented.

    Sotomayor said the court’s decision gives the law a ‘‘stunning reach’’ and could potentially allow a baby sitter to bring a federal case against the family that employed him.

    Jackie Hosang Lawson and Jonathan M. Zang complained of retaliation from the privately held parent company and subsidiary companies that run the Fidelity mutual funds.

    Lawson resigned after complaining of harassment, and Zang was dismissed, and they both sued.