Business
    Next Score View the next score

    Is Patriots’ aggressive Deflategate stance a smart play?

    Critics, supporters weigh Kraft’s reversal

    The Patriots won this year’s Super Bowl with defense. Now the team appears determined to win the Deflategate public relations game with defiance.

    In a striking reversal of tone, owner Robert Kraft on Wednesday ripped what he called the NFL’s “unfathomable” decision to uphold a four-game suspension of star quarterback Tom Brady, ending a two-month cease-fire that began with Kraft’s acceptance of separate sanctions on the club.

    The billionaire patriarch of New England football sounded nothing like the man who said in May that “at no time should the agenda of one team outweigh the collective good.” Instead, he returned to the more aggressive stance he originally took in January, said he regrets the concession, and declared his full support for Brady. The National Football League Players Association filed a lawsuit against the league Wednesday on Brady’s behalf.

    Advertisement

    The question is whether Kraft’s gameplan is the smart play for a franchise that is not only a championship-winning machine but also a $2.6 billion business asset and a marquee member of the country’s most popular sports league.

    Get Talking Points in your inbox:
    An afternoon recap of the day’s most important business news, delivered weekdays.
    Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

    Until recently, Kraft was famously influential — and chummy — with NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell. His public challenge to league authority would seem to jeopardize that status.

    “I don’t understand,” said Ira Silverman, a former NFL public relations consultant who runs his own firm, Silverman Media & Marketing Group, in New York. “I’ve never seen someone of his stature do a total 180 like this.”

    Yet others contend Kraft’s pivot was wisely calibrated. He may look hot-headed or petulant to noncitizens of Patriots nation, but in a sense, they don’t matter because they aren’t the ones who buy into the brand anyway.

    The important audience is the ardent core of supporters who invest in tickets and gear and tune in each week during the season. They already believe their favorite team was unfairly targeted by a bogus investigation and disciplinary process and don’t want to see Kraft cede any ground.

    Advertisement

    “Robert Kraft is handling this exactly the right way,” said David La Torre, president of La Torre Communications in Harrisburg, Pa., which advised Pennsylvania State University following child sexual assault charges against former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky. “People who are fans of the New England Patriots will still be fans, and people who dislike the Patriots will continue to dislike them, no matter what. So he’s speaking directly to his fan base.”

    Indeed, many Patriots fans seem more devoted to their team — and their quarterback — than ever, despite accusations of cheating. According to sales results released last week by the NFL Players Association, Brady’s number 12 jersey was the league’s bestseller from March through May.

    Much of the criticism lobbed by Patriots fans in barrooms and on sports radio has centered on whether Kraft fought the league hard enough. Kraft said Wednesday that he believed his earlier decision not to appeal penalties against the team — a $1 million fine and the loss of two draft picks — would lead to reduced discipline for Brady.

    With the NFL holding firm on Brady’s suspension, Kraft apologized to fans for yielding.

    “He’s basically saying to the NFL, ‘I’m not going to play by your rules. I don’t respect your decision,’” said Rook Campbell, an adjunct professor of political science, communication, and diplomacy at the University of Southern California who is working on a book about sports governance. “That’s the interesting thing that has happened here.”

    Advertisement

    In other sports scandals, club owners have often bristled at discipline but ultimately bowed to league authority.

    In 2012, the NFL suspended New Orleans Saints coach Sean Payton for an entire season and docked the team $500,000 and two draft picks for a bounty program involving extra payments to players who injured opponents. The team issued an apologetic statement and later declined to comment when linebacker Jonathan Vilma, the biggest star implicated, filed lawsuits against the NFL and Goodell.

    More recently, the New York Yankees turned its back on slugger Alex Rodriguez when he was suspended for the entire 2014 season for performance enhancing drug use. The team backed Major League Baseball’s decision and reportedly considered trying to void the remainder of Rodriguez’s contract.

    Contrition may be the standard public relations move, but if Kraft — or any other owner — is angry enough to deviate from the norm, there’s no stopping him, said Chip Namias, who was communications director for three NFL clubs before launching his own firm, Athlete & Event Sports Public Relations, in Los Angeles. “It’s a difficult situation,” Namias said. “He has to balance his responsibility to the fans and his responsibility as an owner, and Kraft has always been very much a league guy. You don’t often see any team come out and blast the league.”

    Callum Borchers
    can be reached at callum.borchers@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @callumborchers.