TRENTON, N.J. — Former US attorney general Eric Holder has written to lawmakers on behalf of Uber to argue against the use of fingerprint-based background checks as they consider how to regulate ride-hailing service drivers.
A letter from Holder making the case that fingerprint checks are an unfair way to screen job candidates and potentially discriminatory was sent this month to lawmakers in New Jersey and Chicago.
Holder’s firm advises the company on safety matters and Uber asked him to write the letter, according to company spokesman Craig Ewer. Uber and Lyft pulled out of Austin, Texas, last month after voters decided against overturning city requirements requiring the checks.
New Jersey lawmakers are debating two bills to regulate the industry. A state assembly measure includes the fingerprint requirement, while a state Senate version would require checks without fingerprinting.
Chicago’s proposal would require ride-hailing drivers to get a chauffeur’s license and undergo a criminal background check and fingerprinting. Democratic Alderman Anthony Beale, who proposed the measure, said he hopes the full council will vote on it this month.
Holder wrote last week that because of deficiencies in the FBI’s database, fingerprint checks can prevent people from getting jobs even if they were never convicted of crimes. He said requiring fingerprint checks can discriminate against minorities.
He wrote that the purpose of the FBI database is to aid law enforcement during investigations and the FBI is expected to follow up on information to determine whether it is complete.
‘‘It was not designed to be used to determine whether or not someone is eligible for work opportunity. Relying on it for that purpose is both unwise and unfair,’’ he said in a letter sent to New Jersey state Senator Paul Sarlo, the Democratic chairman of the committee weighing the measure. The rest of the Legislature was copied in on the message.
In March, the Massachusetts House of Representatives passed legislation regulating ride-hailing companies. Under the bill, drivers would need to undergo state certification and background checks, and a background check by the companies. But the legislation would not require that drivers be fingerprinted, a move pushed by the taxi industry and Boston’s police commissioner, William Evans.
In New Jersey, Sarlo said regulation of the industry is needed and must include background checks, but lawmakers are still debating whether to include fingerprinting.
Uber’s drivers are required to go through fingerprint background checks in New York City as part of individual licensing. There is no statewide regulation requiring fingerprint checks for New Jersey cab drivers, but they are required for limo drivers.
The Limousine Association of New Jersey has come out strongly in favor of the fingerprint background checks, arguing in a statement this week that they are ‘‘a must to adequately protect the riding public.’’
Ana Mahony, general manager of Uber Technologies in New Jersey, told lawmakers Monday at a committee hearing on the Senate measure that fingerprint-based background checks are flawed and incomplete.
State Senator Anthony Bucco, a Republican, told Mahony he couldn’t support the regulation without the fingerprint check. He said he ‘‘can’t understand your objections to fingerprinting’’ and noted that even Little League coaches are fingerprinted in New Jersey.
‘It was not designed to be used to determine whether or not someone is eligible for work opportunity.’
Sarlo delayed a vote on the Senate bill until he could speak with sponsors of the Assembly measure. He said he’s hopeful to have a measure passed this month.