WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday suggested it may side with New Jersey in its effort to make sports gambling legal, in a case that could make betting on football, basketball, and other sports more widely available.
The justices heard New Jersey’s challenge to a federal law that bars states from authorizing gambling in most professional and college sports. If the Supreme Court strikes down the law, giving sports betting the go-ahead, 32 states would likely offer it within five years, according to a report by a California research firm.
The case pits New Jersey and other states against all four major US professional sports leagues, the NCAA, and the federal government. The stakes are high. The American Gaming Association estimates that Americans illegally wager about $150 billion on sports each year.
The NBA, NFL, NHL, and Major League Baseball are arguing that striking down the law would hurt the integrity of their games, though leaders of all but the NFL have shown some openness to legalized sports gambling.
More than a dozen states are supporting New Jersey, which argues that Congress exceeded its authority when it passed a 1992 law that keeps states from authorizing sports betting. The state says that the Constitution allows Congress to make wagering on sports illegal but that it can’t require states to keep sports gambling prohibitions in place.
Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor seemed to suggest that Congress’ action was permissible. But other justices suggested that they would side with New Jersey. Justice Anthony Kennedy told Paul Clement, who was arguing for the sports leagues, that the law seemed like impermissible ‘‘commandeering,’’ or compelling the state to take an action.
Other justices suggested an interest in avoiding striking down the US law as unconstitutional even if they side with New Jersey. Justice Neil Gorsuch told Ted Olson, who was arguing for New Jersey, that the court normally interprets statutes in a way to avoid the constitutional question if it can.
New Jersey Goernor Chris Christie, a Republican, sat in the front row of the courtroom as the justices debated the case. His state has spent millions of dollars in legal fees trying to legalize sports betting. In 2012, with voters’ support, state lawmakers authorized betting on sports at the state’s casinos and racetracks. The action was a challenge to the federal law, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act.
The law barring sports gambling makes exceptions for Nevada, Montana, Oregon, and Delaware, states that had approved some form of sports wagering before the law took effect. Nevada is the only state where a person can wager on the results of a single game.
A high court decision is expected by the end of June.
Shore prices — what dealers pay lobstermen for their catch — have dropped to about $3.75 a pound, compared with $5 about two weeks ago.Continue reading »
Somehow, instead of paying $182.36 and $92.60 via her online account to Comcast and T-Mobile, Jackie Moquin-Vaudo paid $18,236 and $9,260.Continue reading »
Not long ago, Boston companies Jibo and Jana showed a lot of promise, but now their survival is in doubt.Continue reading »
Programs that encourage guests to skip housekeeping, and save energy, are wreaking havoc on workers’ schedules, a union says.Continue reading »
How far away is the Seaport from becoming a retail destination?Continue reading »
Not everything on the Boston waterfront is fraught with friction. Here’s a roundup of what’s progressing along.Continue reading »
The little-known company, a comparison shopping site for auto insurance, looks almost nothing like a hot consumer technology firm.Continue reading »
The director of national intelligence is warning that weaknesses in US cybersecurity could be setting us up for a high-tech replay of Sept. 11, 2001.Continue reading »
The state’s wealthiest residents have a combined wealth of at least $118 billion.Continue reading »