Workers in demand in meat processing
CHICAGO — On any given Monday, America’s biggest supplier of ground beef has 1,000 jobs unfilled, pushing Cargill Inc. to aggressively sweeten the pot on benefits to retain existing workers and hire new ones.
The openings, largely at the meatpacker level, are the result of the Trump administration’s tough stand on immigration and a US unemployment rate reaching decade lows. While the number represents less than 1 percent of Cargill’s work force, the shortage is slowing output and hindering production of new higher-margin products, executives say.
With global demand for meat rising in a robust economy, Cargill and other industry leaders say the need to expand gives them little choice but to boost worker benefits — with added pay in some cases, as well as new housing, health care, and busing incentives.
Companies are adding plants, but “whether or not they can run those plants efficiently is kind of a jump ball,” Christine McCracken, New York-based analyst for Rabobank International, said by telephone. “What we’re seeing today doesn’t indicate that they’ll be able to fully ramp up production.”
“Recruiting and retaining qualified workers in the meat and poultry processing industries was always difficult,” wrote in a note in July. “But it is now a perpetual grind.”
In its August earnings call, Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., the second-largest US chicken company, said it expects tight labor conditions “will govern the pace of industry capacity additions in the near to mid-term.”
Meat processing is tough work, with frigid temperatures, sharp equipment, bloody meat, fast-moving conveyor belts, and hours on your feet. In the past, the plants have offered go-to-jobs for new immigrants, but with immigration rules drastically tightened under President Trump that well is running dry. At the same time, the September unemployment rate was 3.7 percent, the lowest since 1969.
While consumers haven’t yet been affected with a glut of meat still available, the unfilled jobs are preventing Cargill from producing higher-margin meat products, according to Brian Sikes, the agribusiness giant’s head of protein.
Companies are experimenting with automation and robotics. For instance, Cargill has robots that stack boxes. But the progress is slow and expensive and, in the meantime, the company has had to be “creative” with incentives to draw new meatpackers, Sikes said.
While simply paying more is in the mix, it is not all of the equation, according to Sikes.
“We have evaluated our plant labor rates and implemented targeted increases to remain competitive,” he said, though much of the focus has been on quality of life issues in the rural communities where most meatpacking plants are located.
“We’ve done these near-site health clinics to make sure there’s good health care options for our employees right there in that market, so that we’re a draw,” Sikes added. “We do busing to get people in and pay for their busing, pay for their time.”
In Schuyler, Neb., Cargill is working with the governor’s office to secure funding for affordable housing. The company also provides bus service for employees at its Fort Morgan, Colo.-based plant, from Greeley and Denver, 84 miles away. In other areas. it’s set up local clinics to provide free medical services.
Cargill isn’t alone in its efforts.
Tyson Foods Inc., the nation’s largest meat packer, is building a $300 million chicken plant in Humboldt, Tenn., and the company is already working with area schools to build needed skills for workers, said Hector Gonzalez, vice president of human resources in the poultry division.
Tyson has raised base wages, according to the company’s fiscal 2017 sustainability report. It implemented varying levels of hourly pay hikes at all poultry plants, moving the average hourly pay between $12.88 and $20.50, depending on the worker’s role. Meanwhile, it’s helping workers with literacy classes and to get their high school equivalency diplomas and citizenship, the report noted.