RICARDO ARDUENGO/AFP/Getty Images
Parents are barraged with advice about how to protect their kids — and are made to feel guilty for not following it. But what happens when the studies behind that advice turn out to be iffy? A 2007 paper in the journal Injury Prevention helped shape influential guidelines on how to position kids riding car seats. The researchers found that kids whose seats faced backwards were far less likely to be injured in a crash than those in forward-facing seats. The effect was so dramatic — a five-fold difference, according to the authors — that in 2011 the American Academy of Pediatrics said children under 2 should ride in rear-facing seats, a year longer than in previous recommendations from the group.
Not so fast. The article has now been retracted and replaced with a new version, after statisticians found flaws in the original analysis. Although rear-facing seats do seem safer, the effect is much less impressive than the first article claimed. Sometimes the experts do get certain things backwards.
A selfish generation goes on a decades-long rampage, taking the country down with it.Continue reading »
Why is the American story of nature and conservation so white? Carolyn Finney uncovers a complicated history.Continue reading »
Don’t call it Little Russian. Why the Ukraine’s lingua franca is a hot point.Continue reading »
A kerfuffle at Cannes over flats isn’t just about fashion.Continue reading »
One can feel no sympathy for Nazis and still realize that approval of Nazi-punching is likely to lead to escalation of political violence across the board.Continue reading »
The knowledge, tools, and seeds we’ll want if disaster strikes.Continue reading »
As someone who took a year of Sumerian language courses, I took notice.Continue reading »
A new wave of fetal-protection measures creates a collision in American law — and exposes a moral conundrum.Continue reading »
A lot of cancers diagnosed by screening tests will never kill you.Continue reading »