fb-pixel Skip to main content

Legal wranglings drag on in Zumba prostitution case

The trial of Mark Strong Sr. (right) has been delayed since the judge dismissed most of the charges against him. Gregory Rec/Portland Press Herald Pool photo via AP

ALFRED, Maine — The ­defense and the judge are not happy with delays in the trial of the business partner in a prostitution scandal at a Zumba studio. Prosecutors are not happy, either, after the judge dismissed nearly four dozen charges.

But the unhappiest group of all may be the remaining members of the jury pool, who have gone five days without a jury being selected. Much of that time was spent hidden away in the courthouse basement last week.

‘‘They hate waiting,’’ said jury expert Valerie Hans of Cornell University Law School. ‘‘I’m thinking jurors would rather be in a courtroom listening to really challenging and difficult testimony, rather than just waiting around.’’


Jury selection in the trial of Mark Strong Sr. came to an abrupt halt Friday after the judge dismissed 46 of 59 counts and prosecutors appealed. On Monday, remaining members of the jury pool were told to stay home.

Strong’s lawyers expressed fear that the jurors could make the defendant a target of their frustration. ‘‘There’s no doubt they could take it out on him,’’ defense lawyer Tina Nadeau told the judge.

Strong, 57, of Thomaston, was originally charged with 59 misdemeanor counts, including conspiring with dance instructor Alexis Wright, who is accused of using her Kennebunk dance studio as a prostitution front. Prosecutors said prostitution clients were videotaped without their knowledge, and the dismissed charges related to invasion of privacy. The remain­ing 13 counts focus on prostitution.

Potential jurors encountered their first delay Thursday when the Portland Press Herald sued over the judge’s closed-door questioning of more than 140 potential jurors. The state ­Supreme Court ­ordered the judge to conduct the process in open court.Remaining members of the jury pool reported Friday, only to be sent home again because of the prosecutors’ appeal.

On Monday, the trial judge was given approval to decide whether to proceed on the remaining charges. The judge ­ordered a hearing Tuesday on a motion to divide the case into two pieces and continue with 13 remaining counts, while the state appeals her decision to dismiss 46 other counts.


It remained unclear when jury selection might resume.

Hans, a Cornell law school professor who has surveyed ­jurors on their experiences, said jurors and prospective jurors have limits to their patience, though she said there is no ­research to suggest that they would punish a defendant for wasting their time.

Strong, a married insurance agent, has acknowledged having a physical relationship with Wright ­after helping her launch her Pura Vida fitness studio by cosigning her lease and loaning her money that she repaid with interest. He said he never paid her for sex and was unaware of any alleged prostitution.

Wright faces 106 counts includ­ing prostitution and invasion of privacy. She will be tried later.