You can now read 5 articles in a month for free on BostonGlobe.com. Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

Senator Patrick Leahy studying voting rights

MIDDLESEX, Vt. — US Senator Patrick Leahy said he has been consulting constitutional scholars since he has been home in Vermont to see if they have suggestions about ways to protect minority voting rights that many feel were threatened by a US Supreme Court decision that overturned part of the Voting Rights Act.

Leahy, a Democrat and chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said he had consulted liberal and conservative legal experts from around the country, and he would encourage a range of witnesses at upcoming hearings of the committee.

Continue reading below

‘‘I have no idea what the best answer is,’’ Leahy said Monday during an interview in Middlesex. ‘‘Then I can honestly say to both Republicans and Democrats, ‘Look, you call the witnesses you want, we’ll call witnesses. Let’s see if there is an answer,’ rather than saying this is the way it’s going to be, because it is entirely new ground.’’

Last week, a Supreme Court split along ideological and partisan lines voted to end a requirement of the 1965 Voting Rights Act that all or parts of 15 states with a history of discrimination in voting, mainly in the South, get approval from the federal government before changing voting procedures.

The Supreme Court decision said the law’s provision that determines which starts are covered is unconstitutional because it relied on 40-year-old data, and did not take into account racial progress and other changes in US society since the law was passed.

It is up to Congress to come up with a new formula to determine what jurisdictions should be subject to the act.

Leahy said the scholars he has spoken with believe there could be legislative solutions. ‘‘What’s the best way? I don’t know,’’ he said. ‘‘I’ve talked to both Democrats and Republicans and said, ‘Let’s have a real hearing.’ ”

Some officials in the affected states said the old requirements of the Voting Rights Act were no longer needed.

The Supreme Court decision also meant that a number of state local voting laws that had not received federal government approval can take effect.

Leahy cited a Texas voter ID law that will require voters to show state-issued identification before voting.

It had been blocked by a panel of federal judges, but would be allowed to take effect after the Supreme Court decision.

Leahy said it’s proof that discrimination against minority voters still existed.

Loading comments...
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Already a subscriber?
Your city. Your stories. Your Globe.
Yours FREE for two weeks.
Enjoy free unlimited access to Globe.com for the next two weeks.
Limited time only - No credit card required!
BostonGlobe.com complimentary digital access has been provided to you, without a subscription, for free starting today and ending in 14 days. After the free trial period, your free BostonGlobe.com digital access will stop immediately unless you sign up for BostonGlobe.com digital subscription. Current print and digital subscribers are not eligible for the free trial.
Thanks & Welcome to Globe.com
You now have unlimited access for the next two weeks.
BostonGlobe.com complimentary digital access has been provided to you, without a subscription, for free starting today and ending in 14 days. After the free trial period, your free BostonGlobe.com digital access will stop immediately unless you sign up for BostonGlobe.com digital subscription. Current print and digital subscribers are not eligible for the free trial.