During the height of last month’s heat wave, millions of people in northern New England were urged to conserve energy, and some utilities fired up expensive, dirty sources of power to meet demand. But at the same time, at least two wind farms in Maine and Vermont were ordered to reduce the amount of electricity they provided.
Even when the energy is needed most, weakness in the rural system linking wind turbines to the power grid mean wind companies are routinely taken offline or have their output reduced.
‘‘This is a fact of life,’’ said John Carroll, spokesman for Central Maine Power, which is responsible for the bulk of the grid in Maine.
More than $1 billion has been spent on wind turbines in northern Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont in the past decade. Wind power, promoted as a cleaner alternative to coal or gas, has grown from 2 megawatts of capacity in 2005 to about 700 megawatts in the region today, more than Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant.
But getting it to market remains a challenge.
Built on far-flung mountain ridges and hilltops, wind turbines routinely encounter bottlenecks as they send electricity to the regional power grid. At times of peak demand, energy producers are sometimes brought offline or scaled back to keep power lines from overheating, sagging, or even catching fire.
There is also concern that if the system is operating at full capacity and a transmission line should fail, it could overload other sections of the grid and cause a broader failure.
The mandate of grid operator ISO New England from regulators is to ensure a reliable power grid. It is the generating companies’ responsibility to connect to the grid.
Taking producers offline, a move called a curtailment, is necessary to ensure the reliability of the power grid, ISO New England said. But as wind projects are developed, the underlying assumptions of this strategy are under scrutiny.
ISO New England is being too cautious or not planning enough to integrate renewable energy into the grid, Vermont’s largest utility, Green Mountain Power, and Governor Peter Shumlin have suggested.
Last month, Shumlin wrote to ISO New England president Gordon van Welie, asking him to reconsider guidelines that determine whether the grid could safely use the power generated by the 21-turbine, 45-megawatt project in Lowell that was curtailed during the heat wave in July. Another wind farm in Maine, which was not identified, was also curtailed.
At the same time, GMP had to fire up six jet fuel- and diesel-powered generators it has on standby for peak demand.
On Tuesday, van Welie answered Shumlin’s letter, saying that GMP knew its Lowell project faced those limitations and that the problems would be reduced once a piece of equipment is installed to protect the grid.
Construction should be completed by the end of the year, but Vermont officials say ISO New England needs to plan better to ensure future projects do not face similar restrictions.
The challenges will not be going away soon.
The renewables industry is in its adolescence, and the grid operator is playing the role of the cautious adult, said Rich Sedano of the Montpelier-based Regulatory Assistance Project, which deals with electric regulatory issues around the world.
‘‘What we are encountering now are growing pains,’’ he said. ‘‘Part of it is the expectation of ISO New England, which is paid to be conservative. . . . If there were a problem with reliability, no one would complain about their being too conservative.’’
In Maine, New England’s wind energy leader with more than 500 megawatts of capacity, CMP, is in the midst of a $1.4 billion upgrade to double the capacity of the backbone of the state’s grid by 2015. But it will not necessarily help far-flung wind farms, which still face challenges of getting to the grid, Carroll said.
In the meantime, curtailments will remain a fact of life.
‘‘We’ve had to curtail wind and we’ll continue to curtail wind,’’ said Ellen Foley, an ISO New England spokeswoman. ‘‘We want to help people understand why we’re doing it.’’