City Council rivals air views on pay hike, casino vote

Four of the eight candidates seeking a spot on the Boston City Council squared off Monday over whether they would consider shutting firehouses to save money, whether the council should vote soon on the controversial police contract, and whether the Nov. 5 referendum on an East Boston casino should proceed as scheduled.

The debate, streamed live on Boston.com, featured Jack F. Kelly III, a former neighborhood coordinator; Jeffrey Michael Ross, an immigration lawyer who ran for state Senate in 2007; Michelle Wu, a former staff member on Elizabeth Warren’s 2012 campaign; and Councilor at Large Stephen J. Murphy, who is seeking a ninth term.

The hourlong informal dialogue two weeks before Election Day shone a spotlight on candidates who have been largely overshadowed by the historic race to replace Mayor Thomas M. Menino.


Asked whether they would consider closing firehouses to save money, Murphy, Kelly, and Wu said they would. Ross said he would look into the issue.

Get This Week in Politics in your inbox:
A weekly recap of the top political stories from The Globe, sent right to your email.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

Wu, Murphy, Ross, and Kelly wrestled with whether the council should hold a vote soon on an arbitrators’ decision to award police officers a 25.4 percent raise over six years.

Ross said he would urge an independent auditor to study the issue and review the impact the vote would have on the city. “I want to see a vote before the election,” he said. “I think it is fair to residents. . . . And it levels the playing field so voters know where we stand on it.”

Wu stressed that police officers are owed a raise after years without a contract, but ultimately she said she would not vote for the contract if she were on the council.

“I think it’s a very expensive contract,’’ she said. “It is a priority for the city to have good jobs. But that money is coming out of other priorities.”


Murphy noted that the council is trying to get answers the public deserves and will hold a hearing Wednesday to address critical issues in the contract.

“It’s not like anybody is going to be kicking the can down the road,’’ he said. “We are doing our part during the discovery to try to get the most information before making our decision.”

The candidates also addressed whether an Election Day vote on an East Boston casino plan should proceed.

Caesars Entertainment was dropped from the proposed venture at Suffolk Downs late last week over concerns that the gambling giant would fail a mandatory background check. The decision sent the Menino administration and casino supporters scrambling to find an anchor for the project.

Murphy said the City Council took “great pains” to ensure an Election Day vote to maximize voter participation in the mayoral and council races. He said it would be difficult to change the vote because of the election laws.


He added that he is confident a new operator will be found for the project.

(Later Monday, Secretary of State William Galvin said the casino referendum must go forward as scheduled on Nov. 5.)

With a casino operator now uncertain, Wu said voters will not have an opportunity to make an informed decision on the casino plan.

“I believe there should be another period of time when the host agreement needs to be amended,’’ she said. “There should be a period of time when voters really understand what will this new casino look like.”

Kelly also noted that voters in East Boston should be concerned that the Caesars deal “broke down at the eleventh hour’’ but he contends the vote should proceed.

“This is all part of the process,’’ Kelly said. “Let them vote.”

The four candidates are facing off against Martin Keogh, a West Roxbury lawyer; Annissa Essaibi-George, an East Boston high school teacher and small-business owner; Michael Flaherty, former council president; and Councilor at Large Ayanna Pressley, who is seeking a third term on the council.

Their debate on Boston.com is set for Tuesday at 1 p.m.

Meghan E. Irons

Pressley staying neutral
in the mayoral race

While lawmakers and clergy in Boston’s black and Latino communities are lining up to endorse one of the two candidates for mayor, one popular city politician has been keeping a low profile in the contest.

Councilor at Large Ayanna Pressley, who teamed with John Connolly in her last council bid two years ago, told the Globe that she is staying neutral in this year’s race to replace Mayor Thomas M. Menino.

She said that she knows both candidates well — Connolly is a colleague on the council, and state Representative Martin Walsh is a fellow Dorchester resident — and that she has been up front with them about her neutrality.

“I think we’ll be well served by either of them,’’ she said recently. “They’ve both been incredible public servants and good friends.”

Pressley said she is focused on her own campaign to return to the City Council. “I’m running my own race, and whoever the next mayor is, I look forward to partnering with him,’’ she said.

Meghan E. Irons

For more coverage of the mayoral campaign and the City Council races, go to www.bostonglobe.com/politics.