You can now read 5 articles in a month for free on BostonGlobe.com. Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

Red Sox Live

3

1

▲  9th Inning 1 outs

South Portland voters reject anti-oil pipeline initiative

Supporters cited tar sands worries

SOUTH PORTLAND, Maine — Residents of South Portland voted down an initiative on Tuesday aimed at blocking the flow of tar sands oil to the city.

The proposal, which voters defeated 4,453 to 4,261, would have banned the expansion and enlargement of any existing petroleum storage tanks or distribution facilities in some districts along South Portland’s waterfront.

Continue reading below

Supporters were concerned that a pipeline that sends crude oil north from South Portland could be reversed to bring tar sands oil from Canada. They said bringing in tar sands would expose the area and residents to harmful toxins and the failed measure was the only way to ensure that does not happen.

Opponents, including the company that operates the pipeline, poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into the campaign against the ban, which they said was unnecessary and harmful. They said the broadly written ordinance would have prevented petroleum-related and other waterfront businesses from completing such tasks as regular maintenance and upgrades, which would eventually shut down the city’s working waterfront.

Jamie Py, executive director of the Maine Energy Marketers Association, said the vote against the proposed ordinance was a vote to protect the city’s jobs and economy.

‘‘Our fact-based campaign has stood in stark contrast to the proponents’ campaign based on fear and misinformation about oil sands,’’ he said.

Protect South Portland, backed by the Natural Resources Council of Maine and other environmental groups, insisted that the proposal wouldn’t have a significant impact on existing businesses.

‘Our fact-based campaign has stood in stark contrast to the proponents’ campaign based on fear and misinformation.’

Quote Icon

The group said that since the city cannot regulate pipelines, the ban was the only way to prevent future tar sands proposals.

But critics said there was no proposal to reverse the pipeline and that backers of the measure weren’t truthful when framing it as a tar sands issue, pointing to the fact that the measure does not even mention the word ‘‘tar sands.’’

Loading comments...
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Already a subscriber?
Your city. Your stories. Your Globe.
Yours FREE for two weeks.
Enjoy free unlimited access to Globe.com for the next two weeks.
Limited time only - No credit card required!
BostonGlobe.com complimentary digital access has been provided to you, without a subscription, for free starting today and ending in 14 days. After the free trial period, your free BostonGlobe.com digital access will stop immediately unless you sign up for BostonGlobe.com digital subscription. Current print and digital subscribers are not eligible for the free trial.
Thanks & Welcome to Globe.com
You now have unlimited access for the next two weeks.
BostonGlobe.com complimentary digital access has been provided to you, without a subscription, for free starting today and ending in 14 days. After the free trial period, your free BostonGlobe.com digital access will stop immediately unless you sign up for BostonGlobe.com digital subscription. Current print and digital subscribers are not eligible for the free trial.