It’s not every day that a former governor comes before the Supreme Judicial Court, but that’s what happened this week in a case involving Deval Patrick.
The Democrat, who left office in 2015, is accused by a former state employee of defamation and is fighting the charge.
The unique case raised an equally unique question: Is it wrong for justices who were appointed to the court by Patrick to hear his case?
No, said two legal experts. While there are extensive rules governing when justices can and should recuse themselves, this isn’t one of them.
Patrick appointed four of the seven SJC justices, including Chief Justice Ralph Gants in 2014. He appointed Margot Botsford in 2007, Barbara A. Lenk in 2011, and Geraldine S. Hines in 2014.
For one thing, said Renee Landers, a Suffolk University law professor and a member of the SJC’s Committee on Judicial Ethics, such a requirement would make it nearly impossible to hear any number of cases, because many involve the state or high-ranking state officials in some way.
“It would take something more, like some kind of personal relationship or prior professional relationship,” Landers said.
Nancy Gertner, a Harvard Law professor and former judge for the US District Court of Massachusetts, agreed, saying the judge would have to have been somehow involved in the case before he or she was on the bench.
Gertner said that once a justice is appointed, he or she is expected to be impartial.
“Who appointed you at least in theory is not supposed to determine what you do on the bench. That’s what judicial independence is about,” Gertner said.
According to the rules of the SJC, a judge is required to disqualify him- or herself in situations where he or she might have a bias toward a party or a party’s lawyer, or personal knowledge of the facts in dispute.
Also, if a judge or his or her domestic partner, family member or anyone else residing in the judge’s household has an economic interest in the subject in controversy, they are required to step down.
As it turns out, one justice did recuse herself from Patrick’s case. Justice Kimberly S. Budd’s chair was empty during Monday’s oral arguments. Budd was appointed last August by current Governor Charlie Baker.
A court spokeswoman confirmed that Budd recused herself, but would not say why.
Parties in a case are also allowed to file a motion seeking to recuse a justice, the court spokeswoman said. No such motions were filed in this case.
Helen Drinan earned $1.7 million in 2016, putting her in an elite group of top earners that included the presidents of Northwestern and the University of Chicago.Continue reading »
Officials say that same student also discharged a fire extinguisher in another residence hall.Continue reading »
The Hollis, N.H., animal rescue farm has become the target of what the FBI describes as a “vicious” extortion campaign.Continue reading »
A Watertown nonprofit has accused the Newton school district of anti-Israel bias in its high-school world history curriculum.Continue reading »
Some Harvard activists say that Education Secretary Betsy DeVos’s efforts to overhaul the Title IX process are altering the landscape of sex assault investigations.Continue reading »
Massachusetts General Hospital emergency doctors can now prescribe medication for addiction, and a new state law requires others to do the same.Continue reading »
The vehicle, driven by a Boston woman, plowed into five people standing in a crosswalk, killing a girl, seriously injuring an infant girl, and injuring three others, State Police said.Continue reading »
These cases are another example of the unusually secretive process that Mass. uses to consider requests for criminal charges issued in district and municipal courts.Continue reading »
You can protect yourself from climate change, since your leaders won’t. Here are six ideas on how to do it.Continue reading »