Metro
    Next Score View the next score

    yvonne abraham

    Maybe Mila Kunis should reconsider her Hasty Pudding invitation

    BOSTON — 1/29/2015: Amy Poehler accepted the Hasty Pudding Woman of the Year award at Harvard University on Thursday. (Sean Proctor/Globe Staff)
    Sean Proctor/Globe Staff/file
    The scene at Harvard during the Hasty Pudding Woman of the Year awards in 2015. Amy Poehler was the winner.

    How does the sexist throwback that is the Hasty Pudding Theatricals still exist?

    And why on earth would actor Mila Kunis associate herself with it?

    Kunis, who took an impassioned stand against sexism in Hollywood long before this year’s Time’s Up movement was born, was named the Pudding’s Woman of the Year this week. She’ll be feted with a parade down Mass. Ave. on Jan. 25, and an award ceremony at Farkas Hall, before the club begins the annual run of its burlesque show.

    Advertisement

    Now more than ever, that show seems like a relic. Back in 1795, when the Hasty Pudding Club was formed, Harvard was an exclusively male institution. It made sense then for its annual theatrical productions to be all-male affairs, with women’s roles played by men in drag.

    Get Metro Headlines in your inbox:
    The 10 top local news stories from metro Boston and around New England delivered daily.
    Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

    But then the 20th century arrived. And the 21st. Women entered Harvard. And to its credit, the Hasty Pudding Club eventually welcomed them into just about every aspect of club life — except the one for which it is best known: the annual show, where men play men, and men in drag play women, and any actual women who want to be in it are out of luck.

    For three years, frustrated women performers at Harvard have auditioned for roles in Pudding shows in the hopes of breaking that tradition, to no avail.

    “This is the first time I was openly discriminated against because of [my] gender,” said Elle Shaheen, a freshman who auditioned for this year’s production last September. “I never thought something like this would happen on a college campus, especially Harvard, which seems very progressive and open-minded.”

    Of course, the school’s secretive, all-male final clubs give the lie to that image, which is why president Drew Faust and others at the college have been trying, so far with decidedly limited success, to force them to reform.

    Advertisement

    The Pudding performances are islands of exclusion in a student organization that is otherwise pretty open-minded. They’re also opportunities women are being denied: The shows, funded by patrons with deep pockets, boast big budgets, professional directors, and connections with people working in the theater industry. They’re as close to a real Broadway production as college students can get, with 40-show runs and tours that take them to New York and Bermuda.

    “It opens doors for you,” said Liz Kantor, a senior who has auditioned three times. “It provides an opportunity for men that no other organization on campus can even come close to providing for women. Refusing it to half the population is the very definition of unfair.”

    But the shows don’t just exclude women: They truck in sexist stereotypes, too. Here, the drag is more like Jack Lemmon in “Some Like It Hot” than Bianca Del Rio in “Ru Paul’s Drag Race,” with male actors sporting giant bras and heels for laughs.

    “They’re just the most stereotypical tropes you can think of, with names like ‘Sheila Rowsya’ and ‘Donna My Knees,’ completely sexualized, damsels in distress,” said Tess Davison, who graduated in 2016 after leading the first group of women to unsuccessful auditions. “And it just compounds that, to have men playing these roles, making fun of women.”

    The men in the productions are doing drag like their fathers and grandfathers might have. And it is mostly men of their fathers’ and grandfathers’ age who are keeping women out, say women who have tried to get into the productions: Alumni and benefactors are the ones resisting change here.

    Advertisement

    “For the most part, a lot of the students were excited about the idea of having women in the cast,” said Olivia Miller, who led that first frustrating wave of auditions with Davison. “It was an issue with the board and others in charge . . . who [seem to] want to maintain tradition for tradition’s sake.”

    Some have pushed back. In 2015, honoree Amy Poehler took a jab at the Theatricals during her award ceremony.

    “I want to say that it’s unsettling that there will be no women on stage tonight,” she said. “You know it’s time for a change when the Augusta National Golf Club has lapped you in terms of being progressive.”

    And in 2016, 86 Pudding alumni signed a petition asking that women be allowed to join the cast. But the old guard has prevailed.

    How they can continue to do so, especially now, when women in Hollywood and their allies are on a crusade against sexism and harassment, is unfathomable. A spokesman for the Hasty Pudding Club did not respond to requests for an interview.

    In November 2016, before the revelations about predatory producer Harvey Weinstein produced their seismic consequences, Mila Kunis wrote an impassioned manifesto describing moments in her career when “I have been insulted, sidelined, paid less, creatively ignored, and otherwise diminished based on my gender.”

    “I’m done compromising,” she went on. “Even more so, I’m done with being compromised.”

    Not quite, it seems.

    Globe columnist Yvonne Abraham can be reached at yvonne.abraham@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @GlobeAbraham.