Top state Republican calls for end to neutrality in Baker primary

A top Republican does not want the party to support gubernatorial candidate Scott Lively (above), who does not support gay rights.
Globe Photo/File
A top Republican does not want the party to support gubernatorial candidate Scott Lively (above), who does not support gay rights.

Unleashing a scorching attack on the crusading antigay GOP gubernatorial candidate Scott Lively, a senior state Republican leader is calling on his party to scrap rules banning it from taking sides in primary fights and urging it to put its full organizational muscle behind Governor Charlie Baker’s reelection.

House minority leader Bradley H. Jones has asked the state party’s top leadership to vote on his resolution that would specifically bar the organization from helping Lively, citing the challenger’s highly inflammatory anti-LGBT activities, according to a copy of Jones’s e-mail obtained by the Globe.

A conference call to take up the resolution among members of the party’s executive committee is scheduled for Tuesday evening. But GOP insiders say the measure is expected to win approval.


In his e-mail to the committee last week, Jones, who sits on the panel, argued the GOP’s credibility is on the line and called on his colleagues to resist Lively’s demands for equal support.

Get Metro Headlines in your inbox:
The 10 top local news stories from metro Boston and around New England delivered daily.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

“It sickens me to think that we would be extorted into putting our Party’s resources — and, more importantly, the credibility of our institution, our elected officials, and our candidates — behind someone who appeared in a state-owned Russian TV propaganda video, claims that the Holocaust was perpetrated by homosexuals, and is credited with inspiring Ugandan laws that made homosexuality a crime punishable by death,’’ Jones said. (While Lively consulted with Ugandans as they debated antigay laws, he has since stated he thought the country’s laws were too harsh.)

Lively, a conservative Springfield minister, attacked the state party last week over its help for Baker after the Globe reported that the state GOP is driving the signature gathering for the governor and his running mate, Lieutenant Governor Karyn Polito.

In a letter to the party, Lively demanded the GOP either pay a firm to gather 10,000 certified nomination signatures for him, or waive the $25,000 state convention fee, money he says he can use to pay professional signature gatherers.

But Jones said the party’s bowing to Lively’s demands would damage its credibility.


“Even the slightest suggestion that the MassGOP is supporting Mr. Lively’s toxic candidacy would poison our party and make it politically untenable for other great Republican candidates and voters across Massachusetts to associate themselves with us,” he said. “As Executive Committee members, we cannot allow this to happen, and in fact must take affirmative action to stop it.”

Jones did not respond to calls made to his North Reading home.

Among Lively’s most controversial writings has been his linking Nazism to homosexuality. He and a co-writer state in the preface of a book in the 1990s that “homosexuals invented and ran the Nazi Party.”

The Massachusetts GOP has not repealed the rule in recent state political history. But scrapping it could solve its current political problem, which party officials created by exclusively using their staff to organize petition drives around the state for Baker and Polito.

If the resolution is adopted, it would also be a clear demonstration of Baker’s tight control of the party and his ability to use its resources to raise money and finance his political activities. Since becoming governor, Baker has edged out any major opposition in the party, including the social conservatives who strongly oppose his more liberal positions on gay rights and abortion rights.


But, it also could provoke legal challenges from Lively, who said Jones’s e-mail confirms his claims the party has broken its rules. Lively also said Jones is “confused” over what he is demanding.

“I’m not demanding an endorsement from the party but an apology and compensation for damages to my campaign caused by their egregious ongoing violation of their own neutrality rules,’’ he said when asked to respond the House GOP leader.

“His call for a vote by the executive committee to rescind the neutrality policy is not only too late to avoid harming me, it significantly bolsters my legal position by admitting in writing that the party is presently in breach,’’ he said.

“As for his defamatory rhetoric, I would counter that under long-standing Republican principles, and the plain language of the national and state Republican platforms, it is Mr. Baker’s open and notorious support for the killing of unborn babies in the womb that is ‘violent’ and ‘toxic’ and ‘extreme,’ not my scholarship on well-documented LGBT history, which I would be pleased to debate him or his designee in any neutral public forum,” he said in an e-mail to the Globe.

Still, Jones told his leadership colleagues that he supports giving Lively the opportunity to compete at the April endorsement convention, where any candidate seeking to get on the GOP primary ballot must get 15 percent of the delegate votes.

“While it is important for us to ensure that our upcoming state convention is accessible, fair, and transparent for all delegates and candidates, it is equally important for our Party to clearly, unequivocally, and immediately reject any association with Mr. Lively’s views,’’ Jones said.

“But we should not wait until the State Convention to make a strong statement against Mr. Lively’s detestable record,’’ he added.

Lively, who ran as an independent for governor in 2014 and gained just 1 percent of the vote, said he would agree to drop his demands for monetary compensation if Baker “agrees to begin honoring the neutrality rules as of this week, and to debate me on live television in late March or early April on the question of whose ethics, values and policy proposals are more likely to restore Massachusetts to her former greatness.”

Frank Phillips can be reached at