fb-pixel Skip to main content

Warren suggests Native Americans should be ‘part of the conversation’ about reparations

Senator Elizabeth Warren answered questions from the media after the New Hampshire Democratic Party's 60th annual McIntyre-Shaheen 100 Club Dinner in Manchester. Nathan Klima for The Boston Globe

MANCHESTER, N.H. — US Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts suggested Friday that Native Americans, not just African Americans, should be “part of the conversation” when it comes to the federal government providing reparations as a way to address ways minorities have been punished in American history.

Reparations, either through making simple financial payments or more broadly by addressing structural discrimination via health, education, and housing policies, have been a topic on the presidential campaign trail this week. Four candidates, including Warren, said they backed reparations of some kind to African Americans as a way of addressing slavery and the legacy of slavery centuries later.


After speaking at the New Hampshire Democratic Party’s major fundraising gala in Manchester, Warren was asked by reporters to expand on her position on reparations.

“America has an ugly history of racism,” said Warren. “We need to confront it head on. And we need to talk about the right way to address it and make change.”

In a follow-up question, she was asked whether Native Americans should be included in the discussion of reparations.

“I think it is a part of the conversation, and I think it is an important part of the conversation,” said Warren.

Later, the senator expanded on her remarks in a written statement.

“Tribal nations have unique interests, priorities, and histories, and should not be treated monolithically,” she said. “I fully support the federal government doing far more to live up to its existing trust and treaty responsibilities and that includes a robust discussion about historical injustices against Native people. Tribal nations have a government-to-government relationship with the federal government, and they deserve a seat at the table in all decisions that will affect the well-being of their people and their communities.”

For Warren the mere mention of the words “Native American” can be tricky political territory. She has faced questions about her own Native American ancestry since her first run for the Senate against Republican Scott Brown in 2012.


At the time, she was accused of claiming Native American heritage as a way to advance her career, something she has steadfastly denied. An exhaustive investigation by the Globe last year found that her claim to Native American ancestry was not considered by the Harvard Law School faculty when she was hired — nor by officials at the law schools where she previously worked.

While running for reelection late last year, Warren took a DNA test that provided “strong evidence” that she had a Native American in her family, dating back 6 to 10 generations. The test was an attempt to diffuse questions about her heritage but drew significant political backlash.

The drip-drip-drip of coverage continued earlier this month when the Washington Post reported that Warren, in her own handwriting, said she was a Native American on a Texas state bar registration form in 1986.

CORRECTION: A previous version of this story misidentified the Texas form Warren filled out in 1986.

James Pindell can be reached at james.pindell@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @jamespindell or subscribe to his Ground Game newsletter on politics:http://pages.email.bostonglobe.com/GroundGameSignUp