Newton’s spending should be challenged

In 2010, CNN Money ranked Newton the third best city to live in. In October, Money magazine found the city to be the fourth best place to live in the United States, saying “Newton’s educational opportunities and community activities are what boosted it to the top of list.”

So what’s the problem? Newton’s chief financial officer works for the mayor, so of course she supports and defends his three override proposals (“Aldermen to vote on overrides,” Dec. 2). I agree the numbers seem conservative; too conservative, in fact, to be realistic. Yet there appears to be no opposition from voters to the projected figures or to current spending levels. No taxpayer scrutiny and no demand for accountability is unacceptable.


The mayor’s override request failed in 2008, given the state of the economy at that time. And the economy is worse now. What’s remarkable is no one has the backbone to confront and challenge the unsustainable contracts Newton continually negotiates, because salaries, pensions, and benefits comprise the majority of Newton’s expenses.

Brenda Loew  

Newton Upper Falls  

Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com