WASHINGTON — UN Ambassador Susan Rice told lawmakers Tuesday that her initial explanation of the deadly Sept. 11 raid in Libya was wrong, but her concession failed to mollify three Republican senators who signaled they would oppose her possible nomination to be secretary of state.
In a closed-door meeting that Rice requested, the ambassador answered questions from Senators John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire about her much-maligned explanations over the cause of the attack on the US diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. She was joined by acting CIA director Michael Morell.
‘‘The talking points provided by the intelligence community, and the initial assessment upon which they were based, were incorrect in a key respect: There was no protest or demonstration in Benghazi,’’ Rice said after the meeting. ‘‘While we certainly wish that we had had perfect information just days after the terrorist attack, as is often the case the intelligence assessment has evolved.’’
Rice’s unusual visit to Capitol Hill — typically only nominees meet privately with lawmakers — reflects the Obama administration’s campaign for the current front-runner to replace Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton against some strenuous GOP opposition.
‘‘We are significantly troubled by many of the answers that we got and some that we didn’t get concerning evidence that was leading up to the attack on the consulate,’’ McCain told reporters after emerging from the hour-plus session that he described as candid.
Said Graham: ‘‘Bottom line, I’m more disturbed now than I was before that 16 September explanation.’’ He said in a later interview that Rice went ‘‘far beyond the flawed talking points’’ and should be held accountable.
‘‘I’m more troubled today,’’ said Ayotte, who argued that it was clear in the days after the attack that it was terrorism and not a spontaneous demonstration prompted by an anti-Muslim video.
The White House remained defiant in its support for Rice, arguing that she was relying on an assessment from the intelligence community and had no responsibility in compiling the information on the cause of the attack. It dismissed what it characterized as a fixation on her national television appearances five days after the raid.
House Democrats, including female members of the Congressional Black Caucus, have suggested that the GOP opposition to Rice is sexist and racist. Senate Democrats, who will increase their advantage to 55-45 in the next Congress, said Rice could win confirmation if Republicans recognize the unfairness of penalizing her for the intelligence community’s talking points.
‘‘It is so unfair to hold her responsible for something that she didn’t produce and which the intelligence community has specifically stood by,’’ said Senator Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat who chairs the Armed Services Committee.
Despite lingering questions over her public comments after the Benghazi attack, Rice has emerged as the top candidate on a short list of possible successors to Clinton, with Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman John Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, seen as her closest alternative.
The strong statements from the three senators clouded Rice’s prospects only two days after Republican opposition seemed to be softening.
Rice planned meetings on Wednesday with Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee, who is in line to become the top Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee, and Senator Susan Collins, a Maine Republican.