Supporters of gun control split on tactics to pass bills

Push for quick acts collides with deliberative plan

WASHINGTON — As congressional Democrats shape their strategy for considering President Obama’s proposals to curb gun violence, sharp divisions are forming between lawmakers who believe the best path to success is through narrowly written bills and a meticulous legislative process, and those who advocate a more guerrilla approach.

Many Democrats, and some Senate Republicans, believe the only legislation that has a whisper of a chance of passing would be bills that are tightly focused on more consensus elements such as enhancing background checks or limits on magazines, subjected to debate in committee and then brought to a vote after building bipartisan support.

That would be a departure from recent years, when leadership often sidestepped committees and sought to take fights directly to the floor.


Others, particularly those senators who have long fought for gun control measures, believe a plodding process allows too much time for opposition to build and prefer to fast-track measures by adding them as amendments to other bills, even blocking bills in ways that have angered Democrats, until they are granted votes on those ideas.

Get Ground Game in your inbox:
Daily updates and analysis on national politics from James Pindell.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

‘‘We can’t sit around for months talking and letting the gun lobby run out the clock,’’ said Senator Frank R. Lautenberg, Democrat of New Jersey. ‘‘If we’re going to make progress, it’s essential that we move quickly and start voting as soon as possible.’’

Democrats are united on one point: For any legislation to reach the Senate floor, Obama will have to put the full weight of his office and bully pulpit behind it.

Without constant public pressure and a concerted effort to woo conservative Democrats, especially those up for reelection in red states in two years, there will be little impetus, numerous Democrats said, to move legislation along. Democrats also may be forced to decide whether to endure a lengthy legislative battle on guns at the expense of such priorities as immigration.

Recognizing that public pressure is going to be required to move such contentious measures, the president’s former campaign aides in the weeks ahead will convert the Obama for America reelection operation into a different kind of outside political group led by Jim Messina, the president’s former campaign manager, according to people familiar with the plans. The new organization will be able to raise money for grassroots campaigning on behalf of the president’s second-term agenda, they said.


Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader who has spearheaded other legislation desired by the White House, will take a more passive role with any gun legislation, aides to Senate Democrats say, letting the administration set the agenda and allowing senators to press ahead through their committee leadership or interest in the issue.

Reid, who was deeply disturbed by the shootings last month in Newtown, Conn., is a long-standing gun rights supporter, a necessity for any statewide official from Nevada.

Obama’s efforts on Capitol Hill will provide the most crucial test of whether the mass shooting in Newtown in which 20 children were killed, and the obdurate response from the National Rifle Association, has ushered in a new chapter in a legislative era that began in 2004 with the expiration of the assault weapons ban.

Since that time, most new gun legislation has emerged in state houses, and Washington has largely enforced gun rights.

Senator Patrick J. Leahy, Democrat of Vermont and chairman of the Judiciary Committee, has a mixed legislative record on guns, but he said the first hearings he would schedule in the new Congress would be on gun legislation. Leahy was the only senator to attend an event with Obama this week to announce his push on gun laws.


Senate Democrats break down into roughly three groups when it comes to guns.Those such as Dianne Feinstein of California and Lautenberg have long labored to strengthen gun control laws.

On the other end of the spectrum are such members as Max Baucus of Montana, whose NRA scorecard is indistinguishable from those of conservative Republicans.

A third group, many of them up for election in 2014, have expressed tepid support for any gun regulation and will be a likely impediment to some if not all of Obama’s agenda, especially a proposed renewal of the ban on assault weapons.