Obama seeks quick passage of limited budget cuts

Wants Congress to delay automatic reductions

President Obama said that continuing budget clashes in Congress could hurt the economy’s recovery.
Charles Dharapak/Associated Press
President Obama said that continuing budget clashes in Congress could hurt the economy’s recovery.

WASHINGTON — President Obama called on lawmakers Tuesday to quickly pass a package of limited spending cuts and tax changes that can head off the automatic, across-the-board reductions set to begin March 1.

Obama said Congress should delay the automatic cuts for a period of months to give lawmakers a chance to negotiate a full deficit reduction package that permanently resolves the threat of the so-called sequester.

‘‘They should at least pass a smaller package of spending cuts and tax reforms’’ to put off the automatic cuts, Obama said, adding that there is no reason to put at risk ‘‘the jobs of thousands of Americans.’’


The president said the economy had begun to recover, but he warned that continuing clashes over taxes and spending threatened to delay or derail that improvement.

Get Ground Game in your inbox:
Daily updates and analysis on national politics from James Pindell.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

‘‘We’ve also seen the effects that political dysfunction can have,’’ Obama said. ‘‘We’ve made progress. And I still believe we can finish the job with a balanced mix of spending cuts and more tax reform.’’

In the past, Obama has said cuts in spending must be balanced by an effort to raise new tax revenue by closing loopholes for wealthy Americans and the oil and gas industries. The president acknowledged that a broader budget agreement is unlikely to be reached by the March deadline, when the cuts to domestic and military programs will take effect.

Obama spoke at about the time the Congressional Budget Office released its annual economic report and its latest projection on the country’s budget deficit.

The budget office showed that the deficit for the fiscal year that ends Sept. 30 would be $845 billion, lower than the last four post-crisis years in which deficits exceeded more than $1 trillion.


That $845 billion difference between government receipts and spending would be equal to 5.3 percent of the nation’s total output, or gross domestic product — about half of what it was relative to the size of the weaker economy in fiscal 2009, when Obama took office, but still higher than the roughly 3 percent level that many economists consider the maximum sustainable level.

While the annual deficit is projected to decline as the economy recovers, the budget office once again emphasized that the deficit will rise later in the decade and continue do to so as the population ages — forcing greater spending for Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security — and health care prices keep rising.

New deficit projections will define the scope of the nation’s spending problem and will help to shape the contours of the fiscal fights between Obama and the Republicans in Congress in the coming years.

The push by the president to avoid the sequester is an admission that efforts to reach a bigger deal with Republicans to cut spending and raise revenues is not likely to be reached in the coming months. House Republicans this week criticized Obama for failing to meet a deadline Monday to submit a budget to Congress.

‘‘This was supposed to be the day that the president submitted his budget to the Congress, but it’s not coming. It’s going to be late,’’ the House speaker, John A. Boehner, said in remarks on the House floor. ‘‘That’s too bad. Our economy could use some presidential leadership right now.’’


Eager to avoid the cuts to military spending, House Republicans have proposed different spending reductions, which Obama and Democrats say would be harmful to important domestic programs.

‘‘Republicans have twice voted to replace these arbitrary cuts with common-sense cuts and reforms that protect our national defense,’’ Boehner said in a statement Tuesday. ‘‘The president’s sequester should be replaced with spending cuts and reforms that will start us on the path to balancing the budget in 10 years.’’

Administration officials have been saying for weeks that the looming cuts have already had an impact on the nation’s economy. White House officials say the sequester was intended to force a more ‘‘balanced’’ set of deficit reduction measures.

They say the cuts passed by the House do not meet that test. And they said the automatic cuts would have serious impacts on the services provided to some of the neediest citizens.

The White House has also been aggressively warning about the dangers of the automatic cuts to military readiness. Leon E. Panetta, the departing secretary of defense, said on Sunday’s talk shows that the country’s security would suffer if they went into effect.

‘‘It is irresponsible for it to happen,’’ Panetta said on ‘‘Meet the Press’’ on NBC.

The deficits that the budget office projects over 10 years are much larger than it forecast last August, mainly because the earlier forecasts reflected that all Bush-era tax cuts were due to expire at the end of 2012 and that the alternative minimum tax, which is intended for wealthy taxpayers with many deductions, would also apply to millions of middle-class Americans without any change in the formula in law.

But in the bipartisan tax deal last December, Obama and Congress agreed to extend the Bush tax cuts for all but about 2 percent of Americans, those with the highest incomes, and to adjust the alternative minimum tax.