Next Score View the next score

    House GOP opposing tax increases

    House Speaker John Boehner responded to a question during a news conference on Capitol Hill on Feb. 14.
    House Speaker John Boehner responded to a question during a news conference on Capitol Hill on Feb. 14.

    WASHINGTON — House Republicans, shrugging off rising pressure from President Obama, are resolutely opposing new tax increases to head off $85 billion in across-the-board spending reductions, all but ensuring the cuts will go into force March 1 and likely remain in place for months, if not longer.

    Despite new calls from the White House on Wednesday to enact a combination of tax increases and cuts to postpone the so-called sequester, the House is moving forward on a legislative agenda that assumes deep and arbitrary cuts to defense and domestic programs — once considered unthinkable — will remain in place through the end of the year.

    Congressional Republicans have relented in the most recent fiscal showdowns with the White House. But lawmakers say they have no intention of surrendering in this one even though Obama has raised the potential of widespread disruptions in government services and even military operations in the weeks ahead. The president’s January fiscal win, which yielded increases in income, capital gains, and dividend tax rates on affluent families, has only bolstered Republican resolve.


    ‘‘The president says he has to have tax increases to head off the sequester. Well, he already got his tax increase,’’ Representative Martha Roby, an Alabama Republican, said in an interview Wednesday after touring Maxwell Air Force Base, which stands to take a deep hit this spring.

    Get Ground Game in your inbox:
    Daily updates and analysis on national politics from James Pindell.
    Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

    House Republicans said they believe they have politically inoculated themselves against claims they are responsible for the cuts by approving measures last year that would have substituted reductions in government programs like food stamps for the lower Pentagon spending. Party strategists have advised Republican members to aggressively blame the president for the creation of the automatic cuts and the failure to stop them.

    Taking steps to avoid a full government shutdown at the end of March, the House Appropriations Committee as soon as next week will introduce legislation to keep the government financed through Sept. 30, the end of the fiscal year, but do nothing to stop the pending cuts.

    The current stopgap spending measure expires March 27, and Republican leaders are eager to avoid an Easter week shuttering of the government.

    In recent days, Obama has sought to force Republicans ­into negotiations: a Saturday radio address decrying ‘‘the current Republican plan’’ that ‘‘puts the burden of avoiding those cuts mainly on seniors and middle-class families”; a news conference Tuesday with uniformed first-responders whose jobs might be threatened, and Wednesday, local television interviews broadcast in eight markets, from Hawaii to South Carolina, urging Republicans to accept his ‘‘balanced approach’’ to unwind the cuts or accept responsibility for their consequences.


    But House Republicans said they are feeling invulnerable in the current clash. Not only can they point to last year’s bills to replace the cuts, but redistricting has made most of them immune to political threats and entreaties. For many representing conservative districts where the president holds little sway, an attack by Obama is a badge of honor, senior Republican House aides say.

    In the last showdowns won by the president, inaction was seen as intolerable. Had Republicans done nothing in 2011, a temporary payroll tax would have lapsed without offsetting tax cuts to ease the blow. On Jan. 1, every tax cut of the Bush administration would have expired at once had the Republicans not relented and let some taxes rise. This time, Republicans need not do anything and deep spending cuts they have demanded for years will go into force automatically.

    Speaker John Boehner wrote in an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday: ‘‘As the president’s outrage about the sequester grows in coming days, Republicans have a simple response: Mr. President, we agree that your sequester is bad policy. What spending are you willing to cut to replace it?’’

    Senior Senate Democratic aides, speaking on condition of anonymity, conceded the weakness of their hand. In late December, as the White House and Senate Republicans closed in on a deal to head off a far larger wave of automatic tax increases, Senate Democrats had urged the president and Vice President Joe Biden to hold out for a better deal on the automatic spending cuts.

    Instead, the White House agreed to punt the showdown for two months, paying down the cuts with a package financed half by new revenues, one- fourth by domestic cuts and one-fourth by military cuts.


    White House aides argued that the minideal would set the precedent for a larger deal before March 1, but that turned out to be not the case.


    The Senate next week will consider competing Democratic and Republican proposals to stop the automatic cuts.

    The Democratic plan would institute a 30 percent minimum tax rate on incomes higher than $1 million, cut farm subsidies, and institute military cuts delayed until most US troops have returned from Afghanistan.

    Neither plan is expected to win the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster.

    Instead, attention will shift to the next deadline, March 27, when financing for the government runs out.