Court rejects CIA’s rationale for drone secrecy

WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court reversed a lower court ruling on Friday that allowed the CIA to refuse to confirm if it had information on the use of unmanned drones to kill suspected terrorists.

A lower court federal judge had sided with the CIA and dismissed a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union seeking those records. In response to the ACLU’s Freedom of Information Act request, the CIA said that merely confirming the existence of drone records would reveal classified information. But the government subsequently backed off that claim during oral arguments before the appellate court.

Friday’s ruling by a three-court panel sends the case back to the lower court, where the agency can argue that the records it has on drones are exempt from FOIA disclosure requirements.


The initial refusal to confirm even the existence of a record is a Cold War-era legal defense known as the Glomar response after the Glomar Explorer, a ship built with secret CIA financing to try to raise a Soviet submarine from the ocean floor. The CIA had said that confirming or denying records in this case would reveal ‘‘among other things, whether or not the CIA is involved in drone strikes or at least has an intelligence interest in drone strikes.’’

Get Ground Game in your inbox:
Daily updates and analysis on national politics from James Pindell.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

In his opinion for the panel, Judge Merrick Garland noted officials from President Obama to John Brennan, now the new CIA director, have acknowledged the use of drones by the government.

‘‘Given these official acknowledgments that the United States has participated in drone strikes, it is neither logical nor plausible for the CIA to maintain that it would reveal anything not already in the public domain,’’ wrote Garland. The use of drones has come under increased public scrutiny recently.

Associated Press