Air Force OK’s plan to base F-35 fighters in Vermont

The F-35 is designed to replace the aging F-16.
The F-35 is designed to replace the aging F-16.

SOUTH BURLINGTON, Vt. (AP) — The US Air Force was expected to announce Tuesday that it has approved a plan to base its new F-35 fighter plane at Burlington International Airport despite complaints that the planes would be too noisy and pose a risk to the community, a city councilor said Tuesday.

Rosanne Greco, who is also a retired Air Force colonel, said she was informed of the decision and had seen a draft of the Pentagon’s Record of Decision approving the planes in Vermont. She opposes placement of the plane at the airport.

The decision follows a lengthy and heated debate in Vermont over the plane, which is designed to replace the aging F-16. Up to 24 of the warplanes will be based at the airport.


Opponents worried about noise, possible accidents and whether the city of Burlington, which owns the airport, could be liable in the event of a crash.

Get Ground Game in your inbox:
Daily updates and analysis on national politics from James Pindell.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

The Guard said the planes could be flown in a way that would minimize noise. Supporters argued the planes would help ensure about 1,100 well-paying National Guard jobs.

Opponents have already said they had retained a lawyer and would file a lawsuit if the Air Force chose the airport.

‘‘The Air Force decision to select Burlington will not stop the campaign to stop the F-35,’’ said opponent Richard Joseph. ‘‘It will make building the campaign against the basing all the more important.’’

The Air Force liked the Burlington site because of its location in the Northeast and its uncongested air space for training flights. Officials also noted the Vermont Air National Guard had an advantage over sites in South Carolina and Florida because transition costs at Burlington would be lower.


The main complaint from opponents was the noise the new airplanes would make and the location of the airport, situated near homes. Some feared the health effects and possible loss of property values.

Opponents also noted concerns about possible crashes and liability. City Attorney Eileen Blackwood said there was no liability in case of an accident, but the city did buy a $5 million policy to protect against lawsuits stemming from airport-related issues.

In South Burlington, the airport’s host city, councilors voted in July in favor of the F-35, reversing an earlier decision. The Winooski City Council voted in July to oppose the plan.

Burlington Mayor Miro Weinberger; Gov. Peter Shumlin; US Sens. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.; and Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt., had said the plane is important to the state’s economy.