Cleveland reaches $6m settlement in Tamir Rice case

Cleveland’s mayor, Frank G. Jackson, left the podium Monday after a news conference announcing the deal.
Cleveland’s mayor, Frank G. Jackson, left the podium Monday after a news conference announcing the deal.Tony Dejak/Associated Press

CHICAGO — The family of Tamir Rice, the 12-year-old boy whose fatal shooting by a Cleveland police officer in 2014 prompted national outrage, is set to receive $6 million from the city in a settlement announced Monday in federal court records.

The settlement, which would be the latest in a series of seven-figure payouts by major US cities to the families of African-Americans who died at the hands of officers, spares Cleveland the possibility of a federal civil rights trial that could have brought new attention to Tamir’s death and to the city’s troubled police force. It also allows the city to avoid the possibility of an even larger judgment.


The agreement, which is in line with settlements in the deaths of Eric Garner in New York City and Freddie Gray in Baltimore, must still be approved by a probate court. Under the terms of the settlement, Cleveland does not admit wrongdoing. Lawyers for the Rice family had been meeting with city officials to discuss a settlement since early last month.

For the Rice family, which had called for criminal charges against the rookie officer who opened fire almost immediately after encountering Tamir on Nov. 22, 2014, the settlement means an end to civil proceedings. But it does nothing to change the decision by a Cuyahoga County grand jury last year to not indict the officer, Timothy Loehmann.

Lawyers for Tamir’s estate said Monday that “no amount of money can adequately compensate” the boy’s relatives for their grief.

“In a situation like this, there’s no such thing as closure or justice,” the lawyers, Jonathan S. Abady and Earl S. Ward, said in a statement. “Nothing will bring Tamir back. His unnecessary and premature death leaves a gaping hole for those who knew and loved him that can never be filled.”


This month, Chicago aldermen approved paying $4.95 million to the family of a man experiencing a mental health crisis who died after being dragged from his cell in handcuffs and shocked repeatedly with a Taser. In September, Baltimore agreed to pay $6.4 million to the family of Freddie Gray, who died in police custody. And last year, New York City agreed to pay $5.9 million to the family of Eric Garner, who died after being placed in a chokehold by an officer.

Mayor Frank G. Jackson of Cleveland said Monday that the situation was “not easy for me personally or the city in general,” but that the settlement “protected the rights of the city and its taxpayers.”

“At the end of the day, a 12-year-old child lost their life, and that should not have happened in the city of Cleveland,” he said. “It should not have happened.”

Tamir had been carrying a realistic-looking pellet gun near a recreation center when someone called 911 to report him. The caller cautioned that Tamir was “probably a juvenile” and that the weapon was “probably fake,” but those qualifications were not relayed to the responding officers, who were told only of a report of a male with a weapon.

Moments later, as grainy surveillance footage showed, a squad car drove over a curb and through snow-dotted grass before sliding to a halt within a few feet of Tamir. Loehmann, who said later that he had feared for his life and had seen Tamir reaching for his waistband, stepped out of the cruiser and quickly shot the boy.


Tamir’s shooting, which happened two days before a grand jury in Missouri declined to charge the Ferguson officer who fatally shot Michael Brown, an African-American 18-year-old, also occurred amid a wave of new attention on use of force by the police and set off protests in Cleveland.

From the outset, activists, the leader of the local police union and Jackson agreed that Tamir’s death was tragic. But the city was deeply divided on whether Loehmann and his partner, Officer Frank Garmback, who was driving the cruiser, had committed crimes, or had been justified given what they knew at the time.

As the case made national headlines, it was revealed that Loehmann had resigned from another Ohio police department after a “dangerous loss of composure” during weapons training. Many questioned his decision to fire quickly, as well as the tactics of Garmback, who did not shoot but whose fast approach left his partner little time to assess the situation.

Tensions escalated when Cleveland filed a response to the lawsuit that seemed to blame Tamir for his death, prompting an apology from the mayor and a revised filing.

Then, in February, Cleveland moved to sue the Rice family for $500 to cover Tamir’s emergency medical treatment but quickly reversed course after a public backlash.

The investigation of Tamir’s death stretched over 13 months and was handed from agency to agency, frustrating activists who saw it as a clear-cut case of police misconduct. Finally, in a hastily organized news conference during the week between Christmas and New Year’s Day, the county prosecutor, Timothy J. McGinty, announced that grand jurors had declined to charge the officers.


By that point, McGinty had been widely criticized for his approach to the case. In what he said was an effort at transparency, McGinty released investigative documents on a piecemeal basis before the grand jury’s decision, including reports from outside experts he had hired who found the shooting justified.

The Rice family called for McGinty to recuse himself and hired its own experts, who found the shooting unreasonable.